Want this question answered?
I do not believe that the International Court has the power to issue an execution order in and of itself. But only the power to RECOMMEND to the country actually holding the alleged war criminal, that a certain course of action be taken.
It exercises the broad "judicial power of the United States"
The Warren Court (1953-1969)
Pronouncing judgment in a given criminal case is an example of a reactive power that the courts do have. Interpreting the law to the accused is another example.
Governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed.
trade
No. Texas and Oklahoma are unique in that they each have two appellate courts functioning as the highest court in the State. In Texas, the Supreme Court reviews civil and juvenile cases, while the Court of Criminal Appeals reviews adult criminal cases. The two courts are independent of each other and of equal power, so neither has jurisdiction over the other's cases. The only exception is that the Supreme Court of Texas is responsible for devising and updating the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which also apply to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
1DFK
The local governments usually derive power from the constitution on which they are established. Most orderly societies have a rule of law which the people in the particular society subscribe to.
federal courts
It will derive it's power "from the consent of the governed."
State constitutions The United States judiciary consists of parallel systems of federal and state courts. Each of the 50 states has its own system of courts whose powers derive from state consitutions and laws. The federal court system consists of the Supreme Court and lower federal courts established by Congress. Federal courts derive their powers from the Constitution and federal laws.