Want this question answered?
A signature should appear at the end of the letter, below everything else (although it is possible to add a post-script, which means that you had intended to end the letter but then realized that there was something else you wanted to say; in this case the signature appears before the postscript, but the postscript would usually then have its own signature or at least initials).
endorse
conclusion
profit is the output after any business transaction while contrbution is the input before the business transaction
Costs that are incurred before the business can start actually producing things. It's the money that's spent spinning up the business, the things you have to pay for before you're able to earn any money. For example, obtaining necessary permits and hiring initial staff.
After the clef sign, before the time signature.
after
A period should come before the footnote at the end of a sentence, while a comma should not.
It comes before the time signature. The clef comes before the key signature.
N.K.A before a signature means "now known as."
Yes, if you can prove that your signature came before the document text, then you have shown that the document was a fraud. But that's the least of your concerns. You need a new business partner, and you need to stop signing blank sheets of paper. Bad habit on your part. HOW CAN ONE PROVE THAT THE SIGNATURE CAME BEFORE OR AFTER THE DOCUMENT WAS PRINTED?
N.K.A before a signature means "now known as."
After the clef, before the time signature.
think twice before you do anything to your life
The comma would come after it.
A signature should appear at the end of the letter, below everything else (although it is possible to add a post-script, which means that you had intended to end the letter but then realized that there was something else you wanted to say; in this case the signature appears before the postscript, but the postscript would usually then have its own signature or at least initials).
The only signature on a traffic ticket in California is that of the person getting the ticket. The officer is identified, and he fills out the citation, but he does not sign it. Here's the scoop. An officer saw you operating a vehicle in violation of the vehicle code. He pulls you over and cites you. The signature on the ticket is that of the person being cited - you. The signature is a promise to appear and answer the charge (made by the officer) and nothing more. That's all the signature is. If you refuse to sign the citation, the officer takes you downtown and your car gets towed. There isn't much middle ground. Either you promise to appear in court to answer the charges (by signing), or you are held in lieu of your failure to promise to appear (which your signature represents). Law enforcement types and the courts have been down this road before. Sign the damn ticket or cuff up. When an officer issues a citation, he is supposed to explain that the signature is just a promise to appear and not an admission of guilt. And it says right on the citation that it is not an admission of guilt but only a promise to appear. Don't be stupid about this one.