no.
The earthquake in Haiti in 2010 resulted in a higher number of casualties and greater destruction compared to the earthquake in Chile in 2010. The Haiti earthquake had a higher magnitude and affected a more densely populated area, resulting in a higher impact on human lives and infrastructure.
No.
Chile but more people were killed in Haiti because the effected area was more densly populated.
Chile's earthquake arrived at approximately 8.7! Haiti's earthquake struck at 7.6. Chile is more rich than Haiti so they have enough money to repair bulding and bridges and pay for the people who are in the hospital. As for Haiti, they are a very small, poor country and need America's help. So help Haiti now.
it is because haiti was a poor countrie and Chile was such a rich place for people to live in
tetonic plates
Haiti, Chile, Washington,DC
I think in Haiti or Chile
The Chile earthquake at 8.8 was about 100 times stronger than the Haiti earthquake at 6.8. The Richter scale is logarithmic. The difference between the earthquakes is 2.0, which is the logarithm of 100.
Chile is about 2700 miles long. I've seen its shape compared to a string bean.
Yes and No. The Feb 27 Chile quake released much more energy( 8.8 on the moment magnitude scale) while the Jan 12 2010 Haiti quake released 7.0 but the Haiti quake killed over 210 000 people while the Chile quake death toll will perhaps reach 1000.