The Chile earthquake at 8.8 was about 100 times stronger than the Haiti earthquake at 6.8. The Richter scale is logarithmic. The difference between the earthquakes is 2.0, which is the logarithm of 100.
well, because Chile is a rich country, and only 717 died in the earthquake, they probably got less than 10million, but the haiti earthquake is far more damaged, and haiti is one of the poorest country, so there houses were less developed
The cost to fix the damage from Haiti's earthquake in 2010 was estimated to be around $7.8 billion.
The estimated total economic losses from the Haiti earthquake in 2010 were around $7.8 billion. Losses included damage to infrastructure, homes, and businesses, as well as loss of life and livelihoods.
The cost of rebuilding Chile after the 1960 earthquake, which was the most powerful earthquake ever recorded, exceeded $550 million. The earthquake caused widespread destruction, including infrastructure damage and loss of life, resulting in a significant economic toll on the country.
The 2010 Haiti earthquake caused widespread devastation, resulting in an estimated 230,000 deaths and leaving around 1.5 million people homeless. The earthquake also caused significant damage to infrastructure, including buildings, roads, and utilities.
Chile is frequently hit by earthquakes - therefore their building codes are much stricter. Their houses are built to withstand devastating earthquakes. Haiti, on the other hand, has had relatively few earthquakes. Their situation reflects the poor housing common to the area, that, while cheaper, is worse in the long run.
well, because Chile is a rich country, and only 717 died in the earthquake, they probably got less than 10million, but the haiti earthquake is far more damaged, and haiti is one of the poorest country, so there houses were less developed
homes in less developed countries are built more poorly than in developed countries. for example, when the earthquake struck haiti and shortly sfter there was a stronger earthquake in chile, haitis affect was much worse because of their building's structures.
Yes and No. The Feb 27 Chile quake released much more energy( 8.8 on the moment magnitude scale) while the Jan 12 2010 Haiti quake released 7.0 but the Haiti quake killed over 210 000 people while the Chile quake death toll will perhaps reach 1000.
The Haiti earthquake measured around 7.0 on the Richter Scale.
it was actually 800 times more powerful, but with the close proximity that the Haiti earthquake struck to the major population center of Port Au Prince, combined with the lower quality of infrastructure in Haiti, this is why it caused so much more devastation.
Chile often has earthquakes, though not as strong as this 2010 one, so they have strict building codes for new buildings. The buildings then are stronger and many of them will not fall down.
The Dominican Republic was not as severely affected by the Haiti earthquake because it was further away from the epicenter of the earthquake. The geography and tectonic plate boundaries in the region also played a role in the distribution of seismic activity. Additionally, the Dominican Republic has stronger infrastructure and building codes compared to Haiti, which helped minimize the impact of the earthquake.
it is because haiti was a poor countrie and Chile was such a rich place for people to live in
alot
lots
Millions of dollars were sent to Haiti after the earthquake to give aid to victims and attempt to rebuild the country.