Want this question answered?
There is no set rule for the manner in which electors may be nominated or chosen.
There is no set rule for the manner in which electors may be nominated or chosen.
Each major party picks a slate of electors, and then on Election Day the voters select one of the two slates by choosing between the two serious candidates.
The state presidential electors are chosen by the individual parties. Each state party organization has different rules how the electors are chosen.
The party of each candidate selects a slate of state electors. It is these people we actually vote for when we cast a ballot for president, not the candidate. The slate with the most votes gets to cast electoral votes for the President. Although each elector is sworn to vote for a specific candidate, there is no control on how they can vote and occasionally there is a "faithless" elector who crosses his party either by mistake or on purpose.
The electors are chosen by the voters of each state in the presidential election. When people vote for president, they actually are choosing the electors supporting the candidates named on the ballot.
The states choose as many "electors" as it has electoral votes and these electors elect the president. The electors are elected by popular vote in each state and each candidate for elector swears in advance whom he will vote for. The electors vote their electoral votes in the Electoral College.
In the U.S. presidential election of 1789,...in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Maryland, every elector was chosen by statewide popular vote.Delaware and Virginia were divided into a number of electoral districts equal to the number of electors, and each district elected one elector by popular vote.in each congressional district in Massachusetts, the voters voted for their choices of electors, then the state legislature chose one from the top two from each district's election. Since there are always two more electors than congressional districts, the state legislature appointed the other two electors by themselves.in Connecticut, New Jersey, South Carolina and Georgia, the state legislatures chose every elector. New York tried also to use this method, but because they could not come to a consensus New York ended up appointing no electors.only the states that had ratified the new Constitution were allowed to appoint electors. Rhode Island and North Carolina had not yet done so at that time.
If the minimum elector is 3 at the least (Washington DC and some small states), that 3 represents the elector for the winning party only. Does the losing party have their electors also but is not capable of electing the president since their candidate lose in the popular vote of that state? Should it be safe to say 6 electors each at the minimum?
If the minimum elector is 3 at the least (Washington DC and some small states), that 3 represents the elector for the winning party only. Does the losing party have their electors also but is not capable of electing the president since their candidate lose in the popular vote of that state? Should it be safe to say 6 electors each at the minimum?
One elector per senator and representative. So there are 50 states, each with 2 senators, plus 435 representatives, for a total of 535 electors in the Electoral College.
popular vote.