Want this question answered?
It prohibits warrantless searches and seizures.
warrant and warrantless searches
Yes. "Hot pursuit" of someone is one of the exceptions to warrantless searches.
(Answer is applicable to the USA only): A warrantless arrest is never served. A warrantless arrest is performed. Following the warrantless arrest, the arresting individual (typically) or authority is required (usually) to provide the courts with a warrantless arrest affidavit wherein the person making the arrest articulates the probable cause for the arrest, which then is submitted to a judge for review. The arrested person will already be in jail or otherwise in custody (and possibly even bonded out), before the signed warrantless arrest affidavit becomes available to the arrested person.
The scope of a valid warrantless vehicle search is not limitless. It is generally limited to areas within the immediate control or reach of the driver, where there is a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime may be found. Searches that go beyond these limitations may be considered unreasonable and violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Yes.
The Fourth Amendment protects from illegal searches and seizures. It requires law officials to have a warrant in order to conduct a search. It is part of the Bill of Rights and was adopted in 1792.
There is a whole list of exceptions to needing a search warrant. This means that if they can prove that the search fit into one of the exclusions then the search is lawful. Some of the exceptions are in plain sight so if they can see it even if its when you open your door. Another is abandoned property. There is also immediate danger to society and yourself. There are also different rules for searches of car in traffic stops.
Conduct warrantless searches in the interest of national security
(in the US) As much as some activist parties would like you to believe they are - they are NOT. The chief reason being that anything discovered during a warrantless search is not admissible in court and is therefore worthless as evidence.
the 4th amendment :D
The government might have access to a person's private information making it easier to conduct warrantless searches and seizures [Apexx)