Population II stars are the oldest in our Milky Way.
Population III stars were the first stars in the Universe, but have yet to be discovered.
See related question
There are about 33% F type stars in our Milky Way.
Population I stars (metal-rich stars) are common in the Milky Way's spiral arms; Population II stars are more common in the galactic halo.For more details, you may want to read the Wikipedia article on "Metallicity". Note that in astronomy, "metal" is an informal name for elements other than hydrogen and helium. This usage is quite different from the usage in chemistry.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
The Milky Way
The Sun is nothing but a microscopic object compared to the largest star in our Milky Way.
stupid dog
Population I stars
All the planets in the solar system are approximately the same age. Extrasolar planets are all approximately the same age as the star they orbit. Population II (low metallicity) stars are the oldest stars, but they're unlikely to have planets.
Population I stars are young and luminous like the Sun. Population II stars consist of globular clusters that are generally much older.
Population 1 stars are metal rich stars. See related question.
Yes, there are young stars in the Milky Way Galaxy.
The Milky Way is a huge group of stars, somewhere between 200 and 400 billion stars. The stars themselves, or the Milky Way in its entirety, is not in line with anything.
There are about 33% F type stars in our Milky Way.
the milky way is a galaxy, there are billions of stars in the milky way galaxy
The so-called "Population I" stars are found in the galactic suburbs, which is where we live. Population II stars are concentrated toward the galactic bulge.
The Earth is in the Milky Way Galaxy. We can see stars at night, so yes.
The milky way is not a constellation