Well if it's the opposing parent, i.e. the other parent who has visitation, then the custodial parent has to inform the court before they moved and visit that with the court, and if they didn't then the visitation parent should have issues with the court of the original jurisdiction.
Yes. If the custodial parent is breaking the court orders the judge can give custody to the non custodial parent if he/she is fit.
The noncustodial parent would have to call the state's child abuse hotline and report this to them, and then await their instructions on how to gain custody of the child if they should be taken away from the parent.
The US District Courts have original jurisdiction over cases challenging Executive Orders.
No. If there is a child support order that means a state court has jurisdiction over the child. If the parent who is paying child support has any parental rights of custody or visitation the custodial parent would need the NC parent's consent and court approval to move out of state. The existing orders would have to be modified.No. If there is a child support order that means a state court has jurisdiction over the child. If the parent who is paying child support has any parental rights of custody or visitation the custodial parent would need the NC parent's consent and court approval to move out of state. The existing orders would have to be modified.No. If there is a child support order that means a state court has jurisdiction over the child. If the parent who is paying child support has any parental rights of custody or visitation the custodial parent would need the NC parent's consent and court approval to move out of state. The existing orders would have to be modified.No. If there is a child support order that means a state court has jurisdiction over the child. If the parent who is paying child support has any parental rights of custody or visitation the custodial parent would need the NC parent's consent and court approval to move out of state. The existing orders would have to be modified.
What state created the support orders & how did the custodial parent cancel the orders & why would the same parent want to reinstate them after canceling them? Based off the way you asked this I'm a bit confused, but I'll assume you meant that the noncustodial parent canceled the orders in IL. In that case, there would've had to have been a reason for IL to cancel the orders, otherwise the state that issued the orders has power over the orders & IL would have to enforce them due to support orders reaching over state lines.
Whatever the court orders
It depends on what the activity is, which parent has legal custody, existing court orders, good judgment, safety, a whole host of factors. The parents should discuss the issue and come to an agreement. If it's a dangerous activity that results in damages and costs then the answer may be yes. The situation would need to be reviewed by an attorney who is familiar with the laws in your jurisdiction.
You need to review your court orders and the laws in your state. The custodial parent also supports the child. In some states the custodial parent has the legal right to claim the child. Massachusetts is one such state.You need to review your court orders and the laws in your state. The custodial parent also supports the child. In some states the custodial parent has the legal right to claim the child. Massachusetts is one such state.You need to review your court orders and the laws in your state. The custodial parent also supports the child. In some states the custodial parent has the legal right to claim the child. Massachusetts is one such state.You need to review your court orders and the laws in your state. The custodial parent also supports the child. In some states the custodial parent has the legal right to claim the child. Massachusetts is one such state.
Go back to the custodial court. Most custody orders and visitation orders etc have a provision against alienation of the child against the other parent.
I would assume that as long as there were not restraing orders or orders of protection against either the custodial parent or the child, the non custodial parent could live any where they wanted. As long as no ones rights are violated, and there is no danger to the child or either parent, I wouldn't think the law could do anything about where either party lived. Hopes this helps
It depends on the circumstances and related court orders.
The non-custodial parents rights are set forth in the court order that established custody and visitations. You need to review any court orders. If there are none in place then you need to request orders from the local family court.