Want this question answered?
They Were real bad people, they have been attacking them and they were a big trouble for Franks
In answering this question it is important to first define what constitutes a crusade in this discussion. Some historians argue that only crusades to the East (I.E. to Jerusalem etc.) where real crusades. This is called a traditionalist view. However, the view that is now becoming more widely accepted by modern historians is that the crusades include all the organised battles/wars by members of the catholic faith towards a certain group deemned to be enemies/threats to christendom, it must also be sanctioned/launched by the current pope. There must also be some sort of crusader beneifit such as the remission of sins or a plenary indulgence. The latter definition mentioned above means that as well as the crusades to the East, there are also crusades against pagans in the balkans, crusades against the German emperor Frederick II, and the Albigensian crusades in Southern France against the Cathar heretcs. As well as many other small crusades. In the begining of the crusading movement, the crusades were all to the East. The main motives for these crusades was the protection of Christian Holy sites such as the sepulcher. Another important motive was the protection of both christians living in the area and also pilgrims who were increasinly facing attack from Muslim forces. During the course of the crusades, the direction of some crusades changed from the east to areas within Europe. This also caused the motives to change. There were no holy sites to protect, and no pilgrims or christians under immediate threat. Instead these crusades could be described as political crusades. This is particularly true of the crusade against Frederick II. Frederick and the pope of the time fell out for many reasons and the crusade was launched by the pope as a way of dealing with his political problems caused by Frederick in areas such a lombardy. Crusades against the pagans and the cathars in southern France, also so not fit in with the motive that apply to crusading to the east. Instead, this was a way of attacking potential threat to Christianity and/or the popes political power. The Pope that was most willinging to sanction these political crusades was Innocent III who was particularly ruthless.
The main result of the Crusades was an increase in trade between the Middle East and Europe.That, and quite some many slaughtered human beings.Also, the real estate of the roman church had increasedimmensly, as all the lease contracts negotiated with illiterate crusaders short of cash included a term which allowed the church to pocket the land of all the knights and nobles who never returned to reclaim their assets,and pope Urban II lost power.
Unfortunately, the first Crusades were not really distinguished by any real level of idealism: Pope Urban II knew that a crusade would serve to reunite Christendom, bolster the papacy, and perhaps bring the East under his control.When the first Crusaders took Jerusalem in 1099, they massacred the population regardless of whether they were Muslims, Jews or Christians.The People's Crusade was really part of the First Crusade. The peasant population that formed the basis of People's Crusade had been afflicted by drought, famine, and plague for many years before 1096, and some of them seem to have envisaged the crusade as an escape from these hardships - a practical reason, but hardly idealism.The German Crusade of 1096 is that part of the First Crusade in which peasant crusaders, mostly from Germany, attacked European Jews. Many people wondered why they should travel thousands of miles to fight non-believers when there were already non-believers closer to home. It is also likely that the crusaders were motivated by a need for money. The only evidence here for idealism is among the authorities and religious leaders who attempted to shelter their Jewish subjects. Certainly the later Crusades were at least as opportunistic as the first. More importantly, they achieved little and resulted in the eventual abandonment of the Holy Land by Christian Knights.
The answer to " Who is the real father of history?" The answer is ARAM NAHRAIN.
No, the knights templar were an organization in the crusades and are real.
Yes it is real... I've tried it myself and I owe much of my online success to the teachings of its CEO...
Answer:When the muezzin (pronounced moo-eth-in, with a 'th' sound as in the word "the") calls the people to come to falaah "Success", he is calling them to the only real success there is:Paradise.
They Were real bad people, they have been attacking them and they were a big trouble for Franks
The ghost of the Angel of Death does not have a wikianswers account, sorry.
The ghost of the Angel of Death does not have a wikianswers account, sorry.
Yes, invest in your college degree and education and it'll greatly increase your chances of success. Real success comes from skill and a little bit of luck.
Keating's path to success is based on conforming to societal norms and compromising his principles, while Roark's path is one of staying true to his vision and principles. In the end, Roark achieves real success because he remains authentic to himself and his beliefs, while Keating's success is shallow and unfulfilling as it is built on deception and compromise.
The only real similarity is that both take place in relatively the same piece of land. Otherwise the "Kingdom of Heaven" movie which deals with the Crusades and the current Arab-Israeli Conflict have nothing to do with each other. Please see the Related Question below to read about the differences between the Arab-Israeli Conflict and the Crusades.
Be happy, it is the most important part. Be faithful and real honest.
I did!! It took me a while, but i did it and it was a real success. Aren't you happy I did that :)
The Real Housewives of Atlanta - 2008 Excess Breeds Success 5-2 was released on: USA: 11 November 2012