Want this question answered?
True. Slavery had very little or nothing to do with the reasons for the American civil war.
They were called abolitionists. They were opposed for economic reasons. They didn't agree with it because they didn't think they could compete for jobs with free labor.
Not at all!
American settlers had to agree to become Mexican citizens in order to settle in Austin's colony.
it gave them power
Historians generally agree, that 1961 was the year in which the US became militarily involved in Vietnam. History may require a re-visit in this instance.
By 1930, over 60% of American history departments were teaching this theory.
Most historians agree that Rome became a world power after the second Punic war.
The atomic bomb was detonated (created) in 1945. That is what caused the cold war. Historians can disagree or Historians can agree; it has no bearing on the detonation date.
You make the mistake of assuming historians agree on everything. They don't, plain and simple. Historians agree on the obvious facts but disagree on the explanations of the grey areas.
True. Slavery had very little or nothing to do with the reasons for the American civil war.
I agree that it's a conspiracy fostered by historians (and those who write the history books), but the fact is that most people just don't affect human history.
Historians and political scientists agree that no one knows exactly when, where and how the first government began.
Most Historians agree that civilization began when people began writing and cultivating, all ages before man used writing are referred to as pre-history.
Most historians would agree that Andrew Jackson's presidency was a watershed period in American history. His administration started the massive westward expansion that eventually enveloped over 3 million square miles.
All historians agree that it would be his code of law.
true