Christian tradition says that Emperor Nero had large numbers of Christians thrown to the lions, but historians can find no evidence for this claim.
Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) says the Christian writers of the fourth or fifth centuries ascribed to the emperors of Rome the same degree of implacable and unrelenting zeal which filled their own breasts against the heretics or pagans of their own times. Thus, the Christians were justifying their own brutality by the myth of earlier pagan brutality.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
No Roman emperor started the practice of feeding Christians or anyone else to the lions. Being sentenced "to the beasts" was a legitimate form of capital punishment in ancient Rome which was reserved for foreigners, slaves, or occasionally citizens who had lost their rights. The sentence was handed out by the praetors. However this is not to say that the praetors were not prodded to issue the death sentence by higher ups.
Emperor Nero, he blamed the Christians for starting the fire
The Great Fire of Rome began in the Christian quarter of the city, and Emperor Nero believed the Christians had started the fire. Because of this, and to appear to the angry population that he was doing something, he expelled the Christians from Rome.
he told the people that the Christians had started the fire.
Emperor Nero of the Julian-Claudian Reign started a fire in Rome and blamed it on the Christians. He used them as scapegoats in order to persecute them because The Patricians, or wealthy class, were atracted to Christianity and if they became Christian they would not "worship" or respect the Emperor because Christians only worship the one true God, and Patricians were the Emperor's power source.
Nero was said to have persecuted the Christians as a scapegoat because there were accusations that he started the Great Fire of Rome in 64. Some modern historians doubt this. It this was the case, the Christians would not have been friends with Nero.
There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.
There was a persecution of Christians in the city of Rome in 64 AD. However, it was not an official persecution and it was not legislated. According to Tacitus, a Roman historian, the emperor Nero used the Christians and a scapegoat because there were allegations that he started the Great Fire of that year.
There were not any prosecution of the Roman Empire. An empire would not persecute itself. There were persecutions of the Christians. The first such persecution occurred under the emperor Nero.
Emperor Hirohito was the emperor of Japan in that time.
The Christians where the Crusaders as they started the Crusades
No he was not. It was said that he persecuted the Christians to use them as a scapegoat because there were accusations that he deliberately started the fire of 64 AD. Historians doubt that because in such an early days, it is unlikely that the Christians were already distinguished from the Jews in Rome. It is also doubtful that Nero started the fire. It is likely that these were allegations made by later ancient historians who were hostile to him.
The Colosseum was started in 72 AD by the emperor Vespasian. It was dedicated in 80 AD by the emperor Titus. The huge arena could up to 80,000 spectators. Public sports held there included fighting gladiators and execution of early Christians.