Want this question answered?
well they both had .leaders .troops .weopens .plans to get rid of each other
The different styles of fighting. The Aztecs didn't fight to kill or conquer, but to capture people for later sacrifices. Spain fought to conquer and they killed every man that passed them. Also the fact that tha spanish troops were seen as gods make it a lot easier for the spanish. The Aztecs also had a lot of enemies which the spanish used very well.
His troops mutinied - they had been on a campaign for ten years, and objected going endlessly east following Alexander's dream of conquering endlessly.
Those special troops mentioned in the Iliad were called Myrmidons.
his troops
Which of the following events could possibly have been a cause of Spanish troops conquering the Inca capital Cusco.
Julius Caesar led his troops in the conquest of Gaul.
The ripping and the tearin, the ripping and the tearin.
American and Filipino troops retreated to Bataan.
30,500 troops
Spanish rebel troops.
True
Spanish, Mexican, Confederate and US troops.
las tropas
Capital Washington D.C.
French don't welcome Spanish troops now (or ever), this question does not make sense, please provide context or elaborate.
American troops (possibly after eating Pillsbury pastries, if I am to believe my cat).