0
Which of these statements is the best description of the population trend from 2002?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Population will increase at a slower rate of growth than the previous 20 years.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is NSHSS?
The National Society of High School Scholars, or NSHSS, was founded in 2002 by Claes Nobel to recognize high school students and offer scholarships and college fair opportunities. Some say it's a scam. Some feel it's a great opportunity to aid them in college preparation. You have a chance in winning the many scholarships they have to offer. But the chance is low. They send emails with surveys and college fair opportunities.
Evolution of National Service Training Program?
The Evolution of the National Service Training Program (NSTP) in the Philippines:During the Spanish colonial years there was a program similar to ROTC at the University of Sto. Tomas .1912 - ROTC started when military instruction was conducted at the University of the PhilippinesIn World War 2, ROTC were called and during the occupation, they proved their worth on the battlefield.After World War 2, the Post-war Training Executive Order 59 made it mandatory for all colleges and universities to include ROTC course in their curriculum.In the post Marcos Era, Citizen Military Training (CMT) replaced ROTC.ROTC returned with the ROTC Republic Act 7077, or the AFP Reservist Act.2001 - Student protests threatened the existence of ROTC.Mandatory ROTC ended and the National Service Reserve Corps (RA 9163) was established.The National Service Training Program Act of 2001 became law on Jan. 23, 2002, the CWS component of the Expanded ROTC evolved into the Civic Welfare ... The VIP-CWS Qualifying Course for Coordinators/Lecturers of the National Service Training Program was inaugurated.Sep 22, 2003 - Department of Social Work and Civic Welfare Training Service, National Service Training Program, spearheaded the celebration of Family Week on September 22, 2003. Starting with a foot parade from the Alumni Promenade Concert Park to Jaro Plaza, students Show more
Arguments about creationism?
Here are some arguments for Creation or against Evolution.These point to Divine Creation:The staggering complexity of every organ and every cell in the human body.The vastness of our minds and emotions.The fact that the universe has definite design, order, and arrangement which cannot be sufficiently explained outside a theistic worldview. (This is how Abraham, without benefit of teachers, came to reject the chaotic world-view of idolatry and the possibility of atheism). For example, theoretical physicist and popular science writer Paul Davies (whose early writings were not especially sympathetic to theism) states concerning the fundamental structure of the universe, "the impression of design is overwhelming" (Davies, 1988, p. 203).The laws of the universe seem to have been set in such a way that stars, planets and life can exist. Many constants of nature appear to be finely tuned for this, and the odds against this happening by chance are astronomical.See: More detailed evidence of CreationAlso:1) The glaring lack of transitional fossils has been noted by the evolutionists themselves, such as this statement from the famous paleontologist and evolutionist George G. Simpson; quote: "The regular lack of transitional fossils is not confined to primates alone, but is an almost universal phenomenon.""The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled" (Nilsson, N. Heribert)."To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation" (Corner, E.J.H., Contemporary Botanical Thought).2) Instances of falsifying of evidence by evolutionists, such as Haeckel's drawings, Archaeoraptor, the Cardiff "specimen," and Piltdown Man."Haeckel exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions, in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent. His drawings never fooled embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start. The drawings, despite their noted inaccuracies, entered into the standard student textbooks of biology. Once ensconced in textbooks, misinformation becomes cocooned and effectively permanent, because textbooks copy from previous texts. We do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks (Stephen Gould).Dr. Jonathan Wells published a book in 2002 entitled Icons of Evolution. Dr. Wells states that the book shows that "the best-known 'evidences' for Darwin's theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked."3) Creationists see the "survival of the fittest" and the dating of rock layers by fossils as being perfect tautologies.4) The fact that some qualified, educated, normal scientists do not believe in evolution. Or at least question it, even if they still preach evolution: "Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species" (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)."To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. It amazes me that this is swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest" (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner).5) The fact that there is a shared, worldwide tradition among every ancient society that the world was created.6) Evolving of new organs or species has not been witnessed during known history.7) Mutations are harmful, not beneficial. One of the tasks of DNA and of long-term breeding is to avoid or repair any changes brought about by mutations. This means that our genetic apparatus is programmed to resist change.8) Mutations, even if beneficial, do not create new organs.9) The fact that a great number of fossils have been found in the "wrong" rock-layers according to what evolutionary paleontology would require.10) The fact that you need DNA to make DNA. No genetic code can be demonstrated to have arisen by chance, together with the ability to read that code and carry out its instructions. Information does not arise spontaneously; and there is an incredible amount of information in even the tiniest cell."A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations" (Michael Denton, author)."The astounding structural complexity of a cell" (U.S. National Library of Medicine).Concerning a single structure within a cell: "Without the motor protein, the microtubules don't slide and the cilium simply stands rigid. Without nexin, the tubules will slide against each other until they completely move past each other and the cilium disintegrates. Without the tubulin, there are no microtubules and no motion. The cilium is irreducibly complex. Like a mousetrap, it has all the properties of design and none of the properties of natural selection" (Michael Behe, prof. of biophysics).11) The problem of the impossibility of abiogenesis in general. "The concept of abiogenesis is not science. It's fantasy" (J.L. Wile, Ph.D.).12) The fact that evolution was once used as support for the belief that Blacks (or others) are less than highly-evolved humans. "Darwin was also convinced that the Europeans were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races" (Steven Rose, author). He also "reasoned that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females" (B. Kevics, author).13. The first and second laws of thermodynamics point clearly to a Creator, since things undergo entropy rather than get more orderly over time.14. "Radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age-estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often very different. There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological clock. The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionists." William D. Stansfield, Ph.D., Instructor of Biology, California Polytechnic State University.15. "Even total rock systems may be open during metamorphism and may have their isotopic systems changed, making it impossible to determine their geologic age." Prof. Gunter Faure (Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.)16 a). At current rates of erosion the amount of sea-floor sediments actually found do not support a "billions of years" age for the Earth.b) The amount of Sodium Chloride in the sea, also, is a small fraction of what the "old Earth" theory would postulate.c) The Earth's magnetic field is decaying too fast to extrapolate a long age for the Earth.d) The rate of accumulation of Moon-dust has been measured; and the amount of dust on the Moon was found to be vastly less than what scientists had predicted before the Moon-landings.See: Problems in Evolutionary astronomye) Helium is generated by radioactive elements as they decay. The escape of this helium into the atmosphere can be measured. According to the Evolutionary age of the Earth there should be much more helium in the atmosphere, instead of the 0.05% that is actually there.Also see:God's wisdom seen in His creationsMore about God's wisdom
Is creation true?
Creationism is based on a person's beliefs and faith system. No one can change your mind either way to a yes or no if you simply won't hear it (which is often the case with Creationism), so you'll have to gather facts and so on to draw your own conclusions.It could be true if science was nothing but an illusion created by God to test our faith. If all scientific facts, theories and laws were really fabrications of God and had no basis in reality and if reality as we perceive it is only there because God put it there for us to experience. So the answer is this question cannot be answered nor can any other question since we do not know if what we really are experiencing is an illusion created by God or real. Since God can do anything though if he is real then everything may or may not be real and what is real now could be changed at God's will. Therefore it comes down to is God real or not and there is no way to prove this since belief in God is faith based and intended to be that way by God according to man according to God.No one can say with absolute certainty that either Creationism or Naturalism is true, although, at least in my opinion, a random explosion of matter creating perfectly function bodies, plants that work in a perfect symbiotic relationship with humans and animals, a planet the perfect distance from the sun that rotates so one side does not become to hot or cold and gives us darkness making it easier to sleep, and, I believe a random explosion of matter would have a rather difficult time creating consciousness and the laws of physics, so ,at least in my opinion, a random explosion of matter seems much less logical than an intelligent creator designing all of the previously listed things to perfectly work together to make life possible, and also may I mention that there is no real evidence for evolution, like say the fossil of an intermediate species. and also there is nothing archeology or practically anywhere that contradicts Creationism (and if you're a gap theorist like I am) even Astronomy doesn't contradict Creationism so, at least in my opinion, facts seem to lead to Creationism more than Naturalism.
Do you believe in the creation story?
Yes I believe in the creation story , as things can not be created so wonderfully by accident . For example we have had a seven days a week and never a eight day a week. I do not believe in the creation story, as told in the Christian Bible. Things as wonderful as all creatures on Earth at present were not created by accident, they evolved as a result of millions of accidents. What's so special about a seven-day week? Actually, a 10 day week was tried by the French after the Revolution, but it didn't work,so perhaps the human frame is somehow programmed for a 7 day cycle. Are we certain that no other length of week was used in civilisations in the distant past? Most cultures have a creation story, equally as valid as the biblical story. The aboriginies of Australia have a very beautiful creation story.
Which of these statements is the best description of the population trend from 2002 to 2012?
The population will increase at a slower rate of growth than the previous 20 years.
What awards has H. Allen Franklin received?
Awards: Named Most Respected CEO, Georgia Trend, 2002; named one of Top 100 Influential Personalities in Georgia, Georgia Trend, 2002.
What is the population of Georgia in 2002?
In 2002, Georgia's population was about 8,560,310.
What was the population of Iran in 2002?
In 2002, the population of iran was about 66.6 million.
After 2002 what was the population of Austria?
After 2002 the population of Austria nwas 8,169,929
What is the population in 2002?
The population of the United States in 2002 was 280 million people. The total world population in 2002 was 6.28 billion people.
What is the population of Texas in 2002?
The population of Texas in 2002 was approximately 21,779,893 people.
What is the population estimate for Pakistan year 2002?
now it is 2011. For Population estmation had to be asked before 2002, not after 2002
What year did Moderat form?
Moderat is an electronic music trend that came out of Berlin Germany. This music trend started with a single in 2002 and after 7 years the whole album was released.
What decorating trend emerged in late 2002 that held promise for the wood office furniture industry?
A trend that may translate to some good news for wood office furniture manufacturers was the desire to warm up office decor that began in late 2002.
What was the population of the Philippines in 2002?
In 2002, the population of the Philippines was approximately 80.6 million people. As of 2014, the population of the Philippines is estimated to be 99.8 million.
What was the population of Summerfield FL in 2002?
The population of Summerfield Florida in 2002 is 19,410. Where as in 2010 it was reported that the population had declined to 14,487. The factors are unknown as to what caused the decline.
