0
What else can I help you with?
Which of these is a constitutional check that the executive has to balance the power of the legislature in the US government?
To veto acts passed by congress :)
Which of these is a constitution check that the executive has to balance the power of the legislature in the US government?
Veto
Why did the framers create a bicameral legislature?
The United States adopted the bicameral legislature for a variety of reasons. First, some of the colonies had used bicameral legislature with great success. Second, the Founding Fathers wanted to be able to balance the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government.
What was proposed at the constitutional convention described a system with a president courts and bicameral legislature?
The proposal described at the Constitutional Convention that included a president, courts, and a bicameral legislature is known as the Virginia Plan. Introduced by Edmund Randolph and largely drafted by James Madison, it called for a strong national government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The bicameral legislature would consist of two houses, with representation based on state population, aiming to balance the interests of both large and small states. This plan served as a foundation for the eventual structure of the U.S. Constitution.
What was Edmund Randolf's counter proposal for having one president?
Edmund Randolph's counterproposal during the Constitutional Convention suggested a single executive, but he advocated for a strengthened role for the executive branch, with the president being elected by the legislature. This approach aimed to balance power between the executive and legislative branches while ensuring that the president remained accountable to the legislature. Randolph's proposal emphasized the need for a strong and energetic executive to effectively govern, contrasting with the more decentralized approach favored by some delegates.
The constitutional convention had to balance states' rights with the need for?
a stronger national government
Did the central compromise of the constitutional convention involved the issue of balance of power within the federal government?
Yes, the central compromise of the Constitutional Convention, often referred to as the Great Compromise, addressed the balance of power within the federal government by establishing a bicameral legislature. This compromise created the House of Representatives, where representation is based on population, and the Senate, where each state has equal representation. This dual system was designed to balance the interests of populous states with those of smaller states, thereby ensuring a more equitable distribution of power within the federal government.
What are the key differences between a parliamentary system and a presidential system of government, and how do these differences impact the functioning of the government?
In a parliamentary system, the executive branch is led by a prime minister who is chosen from the legislative branch, while in a presidential system, the executive branch is led by a president who is elected separately from the legislature. This impacts the functioning of the government as the prime minister is accountable to the legislature and can be removed through a vote of no confidence, while the president serves a fixed term and cannot be easily removed. This can lead to differences in the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, as well as the speed and efficiency of decision-making.
What did American colonists model their legislature on?
The American colonist model of legislature was patterned after the English Parliament. The primary concern was that the government have a balance of power.
What example of the constitutions system of checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
What is an example of constitutions system of checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
What is an example of the Constitution system checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
