Want this question answered?
We have the ability to destroy the world with one nuclear weapon. An entire nuclear war could destroy the entire solar system if we had the opportunity to.
Edward Teller proposed building a 10 gigaton fusion bomb. Such a bomb could easily destroy everything in any of one of the small eastern states (e.g. Rhode Island, Delaware, New Jersey, Vermont). A 5 to 10 megaton fusion bomb could destroy large cities like New York, Chicago, Oakland. Even the ~20 kiloton fission bombs of WW2 destroyed typical cities (except their outskirts) in Japan. So, yes.
Gandhi's opposition was certainly one factor, but the entire world moved toward less imperialism after WWI, and even more so after WWII. He was a major force within a general trend.
the cities of the harappan civilazation were planned cities.
The atomic bomb did not blow up the entire island of Japan. It was however unleashed upon 2 of it's major cities one of the being Nakisakyi.
Nuclear weapon detonations
Nuclear Weapon Detonations
Nuclear weapon detonations
nuclear attacks
Nuclear weapon detonations
We have the ability to destroy the world with one nuclear weapon. An entire nuclear war could destroy the entire solar system if we had the opportunity to.
Nuclear Weapon Detonations
Nuclear Weapon Detonations
one
No. The entire island is evenly covered with cities and towns.
The Greeks wanted to destroy the Persian fleet to remove its threat to their cities. The Persians wanted to destroy the Greek fleet so that the Greek cities would keep their armies at home defending their cities abainst amphibious attack, and they could then defeat the cities one by one, rather than allowing them to joint together in the field.
Yes. So, whatever prompted this question, probably don't do that.