Want this question answered?
It was the western part of the Roman Empire which fell under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic people. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The signs that the western part of the empire was breaking part was the fact that it failed to repel the invasions because it lost political cohesion. There was a lot of political squabbling , infighting and a sting of usurpations.
The western part of the Roman Empire fell under the strain of the invasions of by the Germanic people. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasion and therefore continued to exist. Note that Byzantine Empire is a term which has been coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part. The people in question did not know this term and called their empire Roman Empire.
Because. The eastern emperors were just string
Historians see 395 the point at which the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire split. This was not due to an imperial decision to do this, but to circumstances. This was the year emperor Theodosius I died. He had appointed his two sons as co-emperors. Arcadius was given the east and Honorius was given the west. This it was not in itself greatly eventful. It was nothing new as the empire had had co-emperors with one in the eastern part of the Roman Empire and one in the west part many times previously. The empire split because of two main factors. One is that the two co-emperors were young and inexperienced and powerful politicians in the eastern and the western of the empire took advantage of this to conspire against each other. The other, and most crucial, factor was that the Germanic invasions of the western part of the Roman Empire begun 11 years later. The western part of the empire started to crumble under the weight of these invasions and eventually fell. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and remained powerful. With the pressure of the invasions, western part lost its political cohesion and there was a lot of infighting and many usurpations. At times, the emperors of the eastern part of the empire took advantage to exert influence in the western part.
The fall of western part of the Roman Empire was not the result of destruction. It fell because of a gradual process involving several invasions though which various invaders took over various parts of its lands. The last emperor in the west was Romulus Augustus. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
ANSWER Because the Eastern Empire was not subjected to such strong pressure and invasions by the barbarian peoples such as the Western.
The invasions of the Roman Empire were carried out by Germanic peoples who lived north of the western part of the Roman Empire and were seeking new lands further south. Being further east, the eastern part of he Roman Empire was not affected by these migratory movements. However, over time after the fall of the western part , this part of the empire was suffered invasions (by the Arabs, Slavs and Turks) and eventually lost all of its lands.
It was the western part of the Roman Empire which fell under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic people. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The signs that the western part of the empire was breaking part was the fact that it failed to repel the invasions because it lost political cohesion. There was a lot of political squabbling , infighting and a sting of usurpations.
The western part of the Roman Empire fell under the strain of the invasions of by the Germanic people. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasion and therefore continued to exist. Note that Byzantine Empire is a term which has been coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part. The people in question did not know this term and called their empire Roman Empire.
Because the western empire was plagued by invasions and existed only in name by the 5th century. The eastern empire by contrast survived until 1447
Eastern Brazil.
Historians see 395 the point at which the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire split. This was not due to an imperial decision to do this, but to circumstances. This was the year emperor Theodosius I died. He had appointed his two sons as co-emperors. Arcadius was given the east and Honorius was given the west. This it was not in itself greatly eventful. It was nothing new as the empire had had co-emperors with one in the eastern part of the Roman Empire and one in the west part many times previously The empire split because of two main factors. One is that the two co-emperors were young and inexperienced and powerful politicians in the eastern and the western of the empire took advantage of this to conspire against each other. The other, and most crucial, factor was that the Germanic invasions of the western part of the Roman Empire begun 11 years later. The western part of the empire started to crumble under the weight of these invasions and eventually fell. The eastern part of the empire was not affected by these invasions and remained powerful. With the pressure of the invasions, western part lost its political cohesion and there was a lot of infighting and many usurpations. At times, the emperors of the eastern part of the empire took advantage to exert influence in the western part.
Western because the Rocky Mountains
western hemisphere because the eastern hemisphere has asia in it which takes up much space
eastern terai is cooler than western terai because weatern terai is near to sea
Finland is in the Eastern Hemisphere because it is east of the Prime Meridian.
There is no "why", because they're not.