Scientists most likely consider KNOWN characteristics of KNOWN and named organisms when first classifying an unknown organism. They look for similarities and differences between what is known versus unknown. Major differences exclude known categories; strong similarities include the new organism into a known category. This is how scientists continually build a "family tree" of every organism.
A phylogenetic tree diagram.
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
Review evidence
they relied more on evidence
Indirect evidence from Seismic Waves, and direct evidence from rock samples.
me and your mom
By using important equpment
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
They are important because they take the evidence that was found and they do tests on it and sometimes they can find more evidence, for example: they could find a finger print or they could find fibres that are important to the investigation.
,.DNT knw buah. . .
It allows scientists to organize the fossil record.
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
No. Scientists have discovered fossil evidence that mightindicate that there were, at one time long ago, bacteria on Mars. However, the evidence is sketchy; not all scientists agree that the fossils are in fact evidence of life.
When gathering evidence, a writer should consider the credibility of the sources, the relevance of the information to the topic at hand, and the diversity of perspectives to present a well-rounded argument. It is also important to critically analyze the evidence to ensure it supports the writer's claims effectively.
Idk thats why i came here
To determine important textual evidence, consider the relevance of the information to the main themes or arguments of the text. Look for evidence that supports key ideas, provides context, or helps develop the overall message. Focus on evidence that is directly related to the purpose of your analysis or the questions you are trying to answer.
They relied more on evidence.