,.DNT knw buah. . .
Most elephant shrew species were first described in the 1800s by scientists who classified them as shrews because of obvious physical similarities.
Evidence, not proof. Scientists do not prove things. Your coccyx for one bit of evidence, This is the " stump " of a vestigial tail that is now used for another purpose in humans; to help with sitting. Sometimes this tail does grow out in child development. This is evidence of the concept of evolutionary common ancestry.
The fact about fossils that is the most important to scientists who study evolution is their age. Advancements in carbon dating has made age determining possible. By knowing the age of a fossil, scientist are able to determine migratory and evolutionary phenomenon.
The fossil record provides evidence about the history of life and past environment on earth. The fossil record also shows that different groups of organism have changed over time.
Scientists have determined that the Ursus maritimus or polar bear and the Ursus arctos or brown bear, are genetically related. This is supported by the evidence that these 2 species can interbreed to produce a hybrid, fertile offspring.
By using important equpment
fossils
DNA
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
Biochemical analysis uses similarities in DNA, amino acid sequences, as evidence for evolutionary relationships
DNA
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
They are important because they take the evidence that was found and they do tests on it and sometimes they can find more evidence, for example: they could find a finger print or they could find fibres that are important to the investigation.
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
It allows scientists to organize the fossil record.
DNA sequences .