0
What do scientists most likely consider as important evidence when classifying an unknown organism?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Scientists most likely consider KNOWN characteristics of KNOWN and named organisms when first classifying an unknown organism. They look for similarities and differences between what is known versus unknown. Major differences exclude known categories; strong similarities include the new organism into a known category. This is how scientists continually build a "family tree" of every organism.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoA phylogenetic tree diagram.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What evidence do scientists have to support the relationships of the earths parts?
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
What communicating results of an investigation allow other scientists do?
Review evidence
How did the scientific change the way scientists did their work?
they relied more on evidence
What two types of evidence do scientists use to determine what inside earth?
Indirect evidence from Seismic Waves, and direct evidence from rock samples.
Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?
me and your mom
Do forensic Scientists trace evidence?
By using important equpment
Why is it important that scientists conclusions are based on evidence?
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
How do scientists get empirical evidence?
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
Why are forennsic scientists important?
They are important because they take the evidence that was found and they do tests on it and sometimes they can find more evidence, for example: they could find a finger print or they could find fibres that are important to the investigation.
Why is biochemical evidence important in helping scientists learn about the divergence of primate groups?
,.DNT knw buah. . .
How is radioactive dating important fo providing evidence for evolution?
It allows scientists to organize the fossil record.
Have scientists discovered a germ on mars?
No. Scientists have discovered fossil evidence that mightindicate that there were, at one time long ago, bacteria on Mars. However, the evidence is sketchy; not all scientists agree that the fossils are in fact evidence of life.
A science researcher is reviewing another scientists experiment and conclusion. the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
What should writer consider when gathering evidence?
When gathering evidence, a writer should consider the credibility of the sources, the relevance of the information to the topic at hand, and the diversity of perspectives to present a well-rounded argument. It is also important to critically analyze the evidence to ensure it supports the writer's claims effectively.
What types of evidence are used for classifying organisms in the linnaean classification system?
Idk thats why i came here
How do you determine important textual evidence?
To determine important textual evidence, consider the relevance of the information to the main themes or arguments of the text. Look for evidence that supports key ideas, provides context, or helps develop the overall message. Focus on evidence that is directly related to the purpose of your analysis or the questions you are trying to answer.
How did the scientists revolution change the way scientists did their work?
They relied more on evidence.
