Why did the author write this
The most important question to consider when using a primary source is: Who created the source and what was their perspective or bias? Understanding the author's background and intentions will help you evaluate the reliability and relevance of the information provided.
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
When analyzing the context of a primary source, the reader should consider the time period in which the source was created, the cultural and social norms of that time, the author's background and perspective, and any events or circumstances that may have influenced the creation of the source. Additionally, considering the intended audience and purpose of the source can further enhance the understanding of its context.
How do you think the ancient Egyptians were able to construct such massive pyramids without modern technology? What significance do you believe pyramids held for ancient Egyptian society, beyond being tombs for pharaohs? In what ways have pyramids inspired modern architecture and design? How do you think our understanding of pyramids and their purpose might evolve in the future with new technological advancements and research methods?
A steady food source can lead to new agricultural practices which can transform the culture by promoting settlement, trade, and specialization. It can also influence social structure, art, and rituals related to food production and consumption. Overall, a reliable food source can contribute to the development and sustainability of a community's way of life.
It would have been important for the English colonists to reach Roanoke Island in time to plant crops to ensure they had enough food to sustain themselves. Planting crops early would have allowed the colonists to establish a food source before winter set in, preventing starvation and increasing their chances of survival. Additionally, timely planting would have provided a sense of self-sufficiency and independence for the colonists in their new settlement.
Why did the author write this
Does the author have any hidden bias
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
By definition of a historical primary source (by someone with direct knowledge from the time), a original political cartoon is a primary source. By definition of an English primary source (it is printed), it is a primary source. By definition of the final form of primary sources (see definition of primary source on www.answer.com), it is based on someone's interpretation of the time and is thus a secondary source.
In my personal opinion, it would be a second source,
Historians and researchers primarily base their research on primary sources such as original documents, artifacts, and data that provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of past events. They also rely on secondary sources including scholarly books, articles, and analyses that interpret and discuss primary sources to develop a deeper understanding of historical events. Comparing and contrasting various sources helps to ensure accuracy and reliability in their research.
Primary source because a primary source is from the past/something from someone whose been in that time but a secondary source is something from us/people who have not been in that time, and its also what we think happened then.
A primary source would be a picture from that time. Or something like a diary. I think Davey Crockett had a diary of what happened.
The Earth's Iron Core
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there