Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Massachusetts
Liberty of abode is the freedom to choose where one lives without restriction, interference, or coercion by the government or any external authority. It is a fundamental human right that ensures individuals have the autonomy to determine their place of residence.
have no authority over individuals, exercise unlimited government, place limits on the freedom fo government
No, it would be illegal for the federal government to place such a restriction but not for smaller units of government to do so. This is assuming that you are referring to the United States' constitution and not a particular state. Powers not specifically taken by the federal government in the Constitution are granted to the states. This power is typically allowed to roll downhill to counties, towns, and even subdivisions.
Massachusetts was founded by Pilgrims seeking personal & religious freedoms.
The guarantee of freedom of speech and the press apply to government limits on your freedom, not your employer's limits. For example, if you work at Gimbel's department store, the government could not stop you from wearing a shirt that advertises for Macy's, but you r employer could. Essentially, because you are free to find another job, your employer can limit your activities in the workplace in ways that the government is not allowed.
The noun 'government' is a word for a thing. The personal pronoun that takes the place of the noun 'government' is it.Example: I took a job with the government because it won't be going out of business anytime soon.
A Place Called Freedom was created in 1995.
This restriction has been in place since the very beginning of the US in 1787 and 1788.
Government must be content neutral, or based on time, manner and place NOT based on the topic being discussed.
Where did the first freedom ride take place