0
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provide scientific research on matter regard climate change and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) seek negotiation in international framework to sustain level of greenhouse gas.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoAll the Scientific Academies of the major nations around the world agree that global warming is happening and is by caused by human activity. National climate organisations like the CSIRO in Australia agree that this is a serious problem.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWorld Wildlife Foundation, GreenPeace, Climate Impacts Group.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThere are many organizations working to reduce global warming. Some examples include Greenpeace, The National Wildlife Federation, and the Environment Protection Agency.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago- Greenpeace
- Toronto Climate Campaign
- The Environmental Defense
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoNot many enough.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is there a science group who doesn't believe in global warming?
No. The "groups" that don't believe in global warming are not science groups, but rather groups of disparate individuals, supported (and often funded) by the fossil fuel industry, which has the most to lose from a change to renewable energy.
what groups of people are worried about global warming caused by burning fossil fuels?
Scientists and governments around the world are worried about global warming caused by burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) because of the serious problems it is causing.Oil companies are worried because if we stop burning fossil fuels they will go out of business.
What scientists think there is no global warming?
It is hard to find any research scientist working in the fields of atmospheric science or climate who actually believes there has not been a rise in average global temperatures since the beginning of the Industrial Age. Richard Lindzen, a professor of Atmospheric Science but widely regarded as a contrarian, agreed that global warming is occurring and could be caused by increased carbon dioxide (CO2) levels but believed that scientists were not in a position to prove the connection. Garth Paltridge, retired Chief Research Scientist at the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, agreed that there are good reasons to believe that burning fossil fuels could lead to global warming, but was uncertain as to how significant this would be. Richard Muller, a Physics Professor and longtime critic of climate studies, set out to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated. But Professor Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups." It appears that Muller no longer believes that global warming is not real.
How can global warming kill people?
Realistically, global warming is a needed event. Without this warming we would be dead. The concept of man contributing is different. The warming we have seen of of over 0.2 degrees since 1934 has been blamed on man by many political groups that ignore the fact the planet has been warming for 10,000 years.0.2 degrees of warming is not going to kill people. There is no evidence of an increase in storms. Polar bears are not dieing because of the weather and much of the horror stories you hear about the issue are pretty much that, stories.A:It is difficult to attribute specific deaths to global warming. As glaciers vanish, it seems likely deaths will result from the loss of rivers that serve as drinking water. Global warming will cause (and may already have caused) intensified storm activity, but it is beyond our capability to attribute any specific storm to global warming. Sea level rise is a serious concern, but it will likely take decades for ocean levels rising as a result of ocean warming to affect more than small, low-lying mid-ocean islands. Droughts and heatwaves are difficult to specifically attribute to global warming, but will intensify in some areas and those can lead to deaths.
Why do so many people believe global warming is not real?
Some have claimed that climate change is not real in spite of the scientific consensus, and some have even suggested that the scientific consensus is based on the availability of government grants to perform climate research.One respected scientist who believed that global warming is not real, and who was a longtime critic of the global warming consensus, is Professor Muller, a physics professor at the University of California, Berkeley. He set out to challenge the scientific consensus on global warming but is finding results nearly identical to those underlying the prevailing view. Professor Muller has conceded that the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups."
What pressure groups are critical of the evidence of global warming?
Extremely conservative groups tend to be more critical of the evidence of global warming. This has more to do ideology than idiocy, even though over 97% of scientists acknowledge the existence of of global warming.
What pressure groups are stating the dangers of global warming?
Lots of groups are starting to speak out about the dangers of global warming, including the government, the NRDC (Natural Resource Defense Council), IPCC (Intergoverment Panel on Climate Change), and the WWF (World Wildlife Fund).
Is there a science group who doesn't believe in global warming?
No. The "groups" that don't believe in global warming are not science groups, but rather groups of disparate individuals, supported (and often funded) by the fossil fuel industry, which has the most to lose from a change to renewable energy.
Groups of people that think global warming isnt dangerous?
1st. that's not a question, it's a statement 2nd .Global warming doesn't exist 3rd this answer is kind of bad
What is the name of NGO groups in India working for global warming?
There is one called the Climate Change NGO in Pondicherry.
What is one contemporary example of an issue where scientists stand on one side and various groups stand in opposition?
A contemporary example of an issue where scientist stand on one side and different groups stand in opposition is global warming. Many people claim that global warming does not even exist but most scientist have proof that it does exist.
Is there any difference between who is funding studies for and against global warming?
Some studies that are intended to find evidence contrary to the realities of global warming are known to be funded by multinational oil and energy companies, although apparently through intermediary organisations in many cases. Evidence is coming forward that multinational oil and energy companies are likewise funding public relations resources to counter the scientific studies that find that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.Government and university funding is more usually provided for projects intended to investigate global warming, but which are neutral in their objectives and do not anticipate their findings. An exception to this is the study undertaken by Professor Richard Muller, a longtime critic of climate studies, who sought to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated. The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project at the University of California, Berkeley, was launched by Professor Muller with the specific objective to disprove the science of global warming. It reached the, for him, surprising conclusion that the work of the three principal groups that had analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups."
How does a cow passing gas contribute to global warming?
Flatulence and belching from a cow releases methane gas, which is part of the cause of global warming. According to many environmentalists and animal rights groups against animal agricultural practices like raising cattle it poses a "significant" portion of the Earth's global warming. This isn't exactly true, since the cow poses far less of a threat to global warming than human activity and natural forces like earthquakes and volcanoes combined.
Why does America continue to accept the fact that Global Warming is real?
The evidence indicates it is real, and that human activity is the primary (though not necessarily sole) cause. I'm not convinced enough Americans accept that Global Warming is real to effect necessary changes. Some groups who proposed business oriented solutions (such as cap and trade) have since backpedaled, and if America accepts global warming is real the country is doing next to nothing about it.
What is been done to help polar bears?
Well if people are joining groups to help the polar bears with global warming. What they do is they go around and pick up garbage.
What proof is there for global warming being a lie?
No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax or deliberately lying to say that average global temperatures are rising - the normal definition of global warming. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in this would be career-destroying. The only employment open to trained scientists who value propaganda over research is in some sections of industry, but it is unlikely that any business would seek to create belief in global warming. However, Richard Muller, a Physics Professor and longtime critic of government-led climate studies believed that there was an inadvertent lie behind the science of global warming. He sought to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated and undertook what was termed the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project at the University of California, Berkeley, to demonstrate that there was at least some poor science involved. Professor Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups." Thus the only potential proof that global warming was in some way a lie foundered.
How is global warming making the giant kangaroo rat endangered?
The giant kangaroo rat, a native of California, is endangered, yes, but because much of its habitat has been taken over by human activity, not from the effects of global warming. Its habitat has been reduced to less than 4% of what it was, and the population is widely scattered, existing in little groups.
