The north
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
the north side was more prepared , well they had more man,nurses,supplies.things that will help them win the war.
America was more pereparing for the war 1 and the best !!
The majority of the democrats were on the side of the confederates during the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln was actually a republican. Believe it or not!!!
France
which war please be more specific
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
the north side was more prepared , well they had more man,nurses,supplies.things that will help them win the war.
America was more pereparing for the war 1 and the best !!
No - as demonstrated at the war's first major battle, First Bull Run. Neither side was prepared, and it would be another seven months before any significant operations took place.
Mary Livermore was on the unoin side because she did not believe in slavary.
Yes, he proved to be prepared to go to war.
No. A war simply implies that either side is fighting for what they believe is moral.
The north won the civil war because they were prepared
The former slaves should be on the South's side to fight in the Civil War.
The majority of the democrats were on the side of the confederates during the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln was actually a republican. Believe it or not!!!
i believe their part in the trojan war