Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Slaves in Virginia were typically better off than those in the Caribbean due to milder climate conditions, lower mortality rates, and greater possibilities for self-sufficiency through small farming plots. Additionally, the presence of extended kinship networks among enslaved communities in Virginia provided greater social support and resistance to the harsh conditions of slavery.
No, the conclusion of a statement, often referred to as the βconsequent,β is the part that follows the βifβ clause in a conditional statement. The "then" part is the antecedent. It is the part that comes first and sets the condition for the statement to hold true.
IKEA's mission statement is to offer a wide range of well-designed, functional home furnishing products at prices so low that as many people as possible will be able to afford them. They strive to create a better everyday life for many people by providing affordable and sustainable products.
The thesis statement of "A Walk to Remember" could be: Through the story of Landon and Jamie, "A Walk to Remember" explores themes of love, faith, forgiveness, and redemption, demonstrating how unexpected relationships can change us for the better.
The thesis statement should be a clear and concise summary of the main argument or point of the essay. Without the sentences to choose from, I can't determine which one would be the best thesis statement.
She felt prepared for the presentation; however, she became nervous once she started speaking in front of the audience.
Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
American are better
They weren't better off. This is a fallacy and false. Slaves are people owned by other people no matter where. The white supremacist tries to show that slavery is beneficial to the slave, but this is not true.
Royal Caribbean has much more to do. it has better food and wine as well. However, which is better is a matter of personal preference.
Life in the Caribbean can be hard. They migrate so they can get better lives.
To have a better live
Reasons: Better jobs, Better way of living
they came in search of a better live
It made it a better place.