answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Maria

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Shawn

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which student is most clearly using evidence to support a conclusion?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In this conversation which group discussion technique does Emily most clearly show?

Emily most clearly shows the technique of active listening in this conversation. She demonstrates this by paraphrasing and summarizing what others are saying, showing interest through body language, and asking open-ended questions to encourage further discussion.


In a group discussion, which statement mist clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion?

The author proves he's biased when he uses terms like "silly" and "stupid" -Apex- :)


How is evidence from data used to support the conclusion?

booboo penis


What is supported inference?

A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.


Are barry manilow and johnny mathis gay partners?

There is no evidence to support this conclusion.


How was Paco and Eva's data support your conclusion?

Paco and Eva's data showed a clear trend that supported my conclusion. Their findings aligned with my hypothesis and provided additional evidence to support the validity of the conclusion drawn. The consistency between our data reinforced the strength of the conclusion reached.


Were Cain and Abel gay?

There is no evidence in the text to support that conclusion, nor is it part of Jewish or Christian tradition.


In this conversation which discussion technique does ramona most clearly demonstrate?

Determining new research goals ------APEX


In the following conversation which group discussion technique does Emily most clearly show RAMONA So in that paragraph you think the theme switches EMILY Yeah! Because first he mentions that radiatio?

Using evidence to support opinions


Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?

This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.


What type of faulty logic is used if you make a statement or express a conclusion when there is no evidence to support what is said and you ignore contrary facts?

The faulty logic being used in this scenario is known as argument from ignorance or argument from lack of evidence. This occurs when someone claims something is true simply because there is no evidence against it, ignoring the absence of evidence in support of the claim.


What evidence is found to support the conclusion that classical Chinese political philosophy perceived the state as an extended family in the mandate of heaven?

Classical Chinese political philosophy emphasizes the idea that the state mirrors the structure of a family, with the ruler as the patriarch responsible for the well-being of all. This concept is supported by the belief in the Mandate of Heaven, where rulers were granted their power by divine approval but could lose it if they failed to govern justly, much like a father's authority over his family is contingent on his virtuous leadership. Texts such as the "Book of Documents" and the "Analects" of Confucius reflect these ideas.