Some choices would be nice for a "which" question, but in terms of political theories, most European Kings in the 1600s were absolutist and believed in the divine right of the monarchy, so ABSOLUTE MONARCHY or any derivative of that would be most supported. England, however, was already a constitutional monarchy by this point and the Kings of England knew that they would never be able to assert absolute power again, which meant that those kings would want something slightly different than absolute monarchy, but not terribly different.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
There is no evidence to support that theory.
There are books that have been written on the subject, which support that theory.
evolution theory
mercantilism
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
The divine right theory
the devine right theory
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
the devine right theory
theory
European Journal of Political Theory was created in 2002.
It is generally thought to support the Theory of Evolution.
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
Jacques Bossuet would likely support the divine right theory of the origin of government, which suggests that rulers are appointed by God to govern and that their authority comes from a higher power. According to this theory, kings have a divine mandate to rule and their authority is derived from God.
Red shift does not support the steady state theory.
No