it depends on which prespective you are looking at.
America really kind of divided because most of the Navy and Marines were in the Pacific where most of the Air Force and Army were in the European
for Britain, it was definitely Europe because it was right in their back yard and they were more directly affected.(Battle of Britain, The Blitz, etc.) where in the Pacific they only lost some territories.
In Russia, it was the European because that's where they were invaded from and also they really didn't get involved with the Pacific.
Germany was Europe because that was where they were.
The same for the Japanese and the Pacific.
2. In Europe, the U.S. was fighting more than one country and had more Allies that they could rely on.
It is HARD to find comparisons. But I recall 90k in Pacific, 300k WWII so 210K Europe. Seems Battle of Bulge had more casualties than the entire Pacific War
Pacific theater
World War 2 had the highes death count of seventy one million deaths. This includes the totals from both the Pacific Theater and the European Theater of the war. It is considered there may have been more because there were many unrecorded deaths of both civilian and military personnel.
The Pacific theater stopped the Japanes empire from ruling the whole Pacific Ocean. It also gave America a sort of controll of some captured Pacific areas that would lead to more war and bloodshed (Korea and Veitnam wars). Plus it put the United States as a world power in the new Atomic Age.
The United States devoted ten percent of its resources to the pacific theater and 90 percent to the European theater. This was done in accordance with the Europe first plan which agreed to focus on defeating Germany which was thought to be the more dangerous of the two (Japan, Germany).
European (or Western) Theater is the part of WWII that was fought in Europe with Nazis (Germans), some Italians, and some battles in Africa. Pacific Theater is the part of the WWII that was fought between USA and Japan. There were British, Aussies, Dutch, Indians and Chinese who also fought the Japanese. The Pacific was divided into the South Pacific and the North Pacific, another front was CBI (China Burma India).
WWI was a static war (commonly referred to as a trench war) and was by far mostly a land war concentrated in Europe. WWII was by far a truly "world war" (global war) than WWI was. WWII was also far more mobile than the 1st World War was (originally called the Great War). WWII was so huge, it was divided into theaters; European, Pacific, Mediterranean, China-Burma-India, etc. The Pacific theater, like the name implies, was a naval war; the European theater was as the name implied in Europe.
The missionaries naturally increased the catholics in the area and they also made European culture more well known and more people would then listen to more Europeans when they came , there is more of this at http://bussinessmouse.googlepages.com
Germany was the bloodiest European theater of the Seven Years War. France had to allocate more resources to fight Frederick the Great and as a result, were under manned and under funded in their North American encounters with Great Britain.
No, the Chinook are Pacific Northwestern people; however, the term Chinook refers to those Pacific Northwestern people who can claim a Pacific Northwestern heritage of more than 150 years. Most Pacific Northwestern people are of European heritage. Not everyone who lives in the Pacific Northwest is Chinook, and not all Chinook live in the Pacific Northwest.
The control of Africa had been critical to European nations in 1913 because it offered them more power, territory, and abundant resources as well as a sufficient labor force. Basically, it could be considered as a race between all the competing countries for dominance in 1913.