Which would an archaeologist most likely study? A.Ruins of ancient citiesB.Origins of human beingsC.How plants were domesticatedD.Spread of religions
[(A)]An archaeologist would most likely study ancient artifacts, ruins, structures, and human remains to understand the cultural and societal practices of past civilizations. They may also analyze artifacts to determine patterns of settlement, trade, religion, and technology.
An archaeologist would most likely study artifacts found in ruins as they are trained to uncover, analyze, and interpret material remains from past human societies.
Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?
An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
An anthropologist or an archaeologist would be most likely to study Peking Man, as they focus on understanding human evolution, prehistoric societies, and ancient civilizations. These professionals would be interested in analyzing the fossils and artifacts associated with Peking Man to gain insights into human origins and cultural practices of early Homo erectus populations.
Archaeologist
Archaeologist. <3
They would most likely study Landforms and their locations, since geographers study the Earth.the type of evidence that an archaeologist would find most useful is past. To learn about prehistory, historians would likely study all of the following except.
Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?
An archeologist explores everything.
An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
Archaeologist
Archaeologist hope that helped! :)
Geographers are most likely to study landforms and their locations.
archaeologist