answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Which would an archaeologist most likely study? A.Ruins of ancient citiesB.Origins of human beingsC.How plants were domesticatedD.Spread of religions

[(A)]
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

An archaeologist would most likely study ancient artifacts, ruins, structures, and human remains to understand the cultural and societal practices of past civilizations. They may also analyze artifacts to determine patterns of settlement, trade, religion, and technology.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which would an archaeologist most likely study?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

What social scientist would most likely study the artifacts from ruins?

An archaeologist would most likely study artifacts found in ruins as they are trained to uncover, analyze, and interpret material remains from past human societies.


Who would be most likely to study the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?

Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?


What would an archaeologist most likely explore?

An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.


Who would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if Sumerians used slaves?

An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.


Would a historian or archaeologist most likely explore site of an ancient battle?

An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.

Related questions

What social scientist would be most likely to study peking man?

An anthropologist or an archaeologist would be most likely to study Peking Man, as they focus on understanding human evolution, prehistoric societies, and ancient civilizations. These professionals would be interested in analyzing the fossils and artifacts associated with Peking Man to gain insights into human origins and cultural practices of early Homo erectus populations.


Which social scientist would most likely study the artifacts from these ruins?

Archaeologist


Which social scientist would be most likely to study peking man?

Archaeologist. <3


A physical geographer would most likely study all of the following subjects except?

They would most likely study Landforms and their locations, since geographers study the Earth.the type of evidence that an archaeologist would find most useful is past. To learn about prehistory, historians would likely study all of the following except.


Who would be most likely to study the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?

Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?


What archaeologist would most likely explore?

An archeologist explores everything.


What would an archaeologist most likely explore?

An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.


Would a historian or archaeologist most likely explore site of an ancient battle?

An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.


Which individuals would historians most likely learn about artifacts from ancient cultures?

Archaeologist


Who would be most likely to uncover and remove a piece of bronze at an excavation?

Archaeologist hope that helped! :)


What things would geographers be most likely to study?

Geographers are most likely to study landforms and their locations.


Who is most likely to determine where an ancient temple was built?

archaeologist