It is not called the 'biblical theory' in the Scripture but rather the biblical account of creation. If this is what you are referring to, then see this partial list below along with two other examples directly to follow:
[A note of importance: It is not the Scripture itself that has misinformed or misled mankind, but rather mankinds interpretations of it commonly referred to as religion. Allowing The Bible to interpret itself often reveals dramatically different outcomes of said events - flat earth, earth-centered heavens, heaven and hell, angels interbreeding with humans, age of earth via the renewal of the earth for mankind vs. the actual first creation of it...etc...]
Consider what the director of NASA, Dr. Wernher von Braun, said: "What strange rationale makes some physicists accept the inconceivable electron as real while refusing to accept the reality of a 'Designer' on the ground that they cannot conceive of Him?" (Scott Huse, The Collapse of Evolution, 1997, pp. 159-160).
Or the director of France's Stasbourg Zoological Museum and professor of Biology at the University of Stasbourg, Louis Bounoure said "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Federer, p. 61).
In my opinion, the biblical account of creation was mainstream before the onset of the 'Age of Enlightenment' in the mid 19-20th Centuries. And with good reasoning, fell out of favor due to the many false/wrong religious interpretations of creation and the physical universe. However, many replaced this teaching by accepting another false teaching - Evolution which, like all religions, has a dramatic impact upon society as a whole. But this too seems the last of the 3 wrong teachings of the Enlightenment - Marx, Freud, and Darwin. Genetics or DNA will probably be evolutions downfall.
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Though it is impossible to know what scientists would be foreign or local, some well known scientists are: Aristotle :Father of biology Schwann:Modern Theory of Cell
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
Scientists have proposed several theories of man's origin. Some of these theories are: the Creationist theory, the missing links theory and the out of Africa theory.
Geophysicists, Seismologists, Geomorphologists and Palaeontologists are some examples of scientists who's work involves or is affected by the theory of plate tectonics.
Scientists were having the same problem that Darwin thought would happen. In Darwin's mind his theory took away the need for a God. Darwin's theory of evolution challenged both the Religious and the science community. Some scientists still have the same shallow mind that other scientists had during Darwin's time.
Because they are not scientists and have ideological commitments that occludes their view of the truth. When you have a conclusion and then go looking for facts to support you are not doing science. Creation stories are a dime a dozen. All cultures have them and none of these stories, with some of the contradicting each other, agree with reality.
hups, bzzr
That would be Eve in the biblical history, or some unidentified creature in evolution theory history.
because they have similar limbs
This is because there is more evidence to suggest one theory took place over another. More evidence means a larger likelyhood. But likelyhood alone cannot conclusively present an answer, therefore even though some theories are more PROBABLE, they are only as POSSIBLE as any other theory which has evidence to support it.
Al Gore got his interest in global warming from the works of reputable scientists who have been concerned about the phenomena for some time now. Although the theory is debated in some political circles, scientists have reached a general consensus about the validity of the theory, and on the likely causes.