Young-earth Creationists disagree with the Intelligent Design movement for denying the designer. They also don't agree with long-age proponents of ID.
A different approach:
On the contrary, Intelligent design means, by definition, that there is a designer. While Young Earth creationists and Old Earth creationists disagree on God's methods, they certainly agree completely that Evolution is the adversary.
Many scientists and science educators argue that Intelligent Design has no place in science education because it is not based on scientific evidence and lacks predictive power. They believe that teaching Intelligent Design alongside evolution confuses students about the nature of science and promotes a misunderstanding of the scientific method.
It has never been argued that Intelligent Design has no place in religious instruction. It can be taught alongside, or instead of, the biblical creation stories. However, scientists and science teachers, among others, say that Intelligent Design has no place in the classroom and can not be taught alongside science.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Much (though not all) of the Western world's scientific and educational communities have spoken for keeping Intelligent Design out of the Science classroom. Others feel that this is arbitrary, since they feel that scientific research should have as wide a syllabus as possible, including areas that are as yet outside of the paradigm. Many parts of science that were once considered quackery are now mainstream, including manned flight, quantum mechanics, black holes, etc. If sincere research leads some to describe an infinite wisdom that is apparent, this may be studied alongside other approaches.
See also:
What are some proofs offered by Creationists
William Paley's design argument, also known as the watchmaker analogy, posits that the complexity and purposeful design observed in the natural world imply the existence of an intelligent designer (God). Paley compared the universe to a watch, asserting that just as a watch's intricate design suggests a watchmaker, the intricacies of nature suggest a divine creator.
An example of the fallacy of appeal to pride is when someone argues that their idea or belief must be correct because they are more intelligent or knowledgeable than others. This disregards the actual evidence or reasoning supporting the idea and relies solely on the individual's ego or sense of superiority.
The appearance of design in the world, such as the complexity and order found in nature, can lead some people to believe in God as they see it as evidence of a higher power or creator. The intricate design of living organisms and the universe can be seen as too complex to have occurred randomly, providing a basis for faith in an intelligent designer. This perspective is often associated with beliefs in creationism or intelligent design.
Perceptive.
The Intelligent Design Network is an organization that promotes the idea that certain features of the universe and living organisms are best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than natural selection. Their core belief is that some aspects of the natural world are too complex to have evolved through random processes and therefore require an intelligent designer.
The argument by design, also known as the teleological argument, posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest the presence of an intelligent designer. It argues that the intricate design and purpose in nature imply the existence of a creator or higher power. This argument is often used to support the existence of God or some form of intelligent being behind the universe.
Centre for Intelligent Design was created in 2010.
The Intelligent Design Of... was created on 2006-07-25.
Intelligent Design - book - was created in 1999-10.
In a religious context, Intelligent Design would normally be capitalised. On the other hand if I told an engineer that his new invention is an intelligent design, this usage would not be capitalised.
There are no scientific theories in competition for the theory of evolution - it is the only credible theory that explains the origin and diversity of the earth's species. . The primary alternate assertion to evolution, especially in the USA, is Creationalism, of which Intelligent Design is one example. Creationalism argues that all living things are the product of a god or an intelligent creator.
The cast of Intelligent Design - 2008 includes: Kyra Sullivan as Main
Intelligent Design does not meet the basic requirements to be considered a science. It is not based on testable evidence or experiments. The court found that those who argued for Intelligent Design did not prove that ID meets these requirements.
A:When Intelligent Design was proposed for inclusion in the school syllabus as an alternative hypothesis to science, the United States Supreme Court considered the matter and decided that Intelligent Design is indeed a tenet of religion.
Intelligent Falling is a parody of Intelligent Design. It says that gravity is not a mindless, natural force, but things fall because they are controlled by an intelligent, supernatural being. It's a joke so there is no actual theory of intelligent falling. It is meant to mock intelligent design, which is the belief that life was designed by an intelligent supernatural being.
What are some of the design features of the termite mounds that make them very special and intelligent? What are some of the design features of the termite mounds that make them very special and intelligent?
none