Market forces with a small degree of state intervention qualify as such. Mexico is a capitalist country, but its government tends to gravitate towards the center-right.
The distribution of wealth and resources in a society is typically influenced by a combination of factors, including government policies, economic systems, corporate entities, and individual behavior. Ultimately, the control of wealth and resources can be held by various entities such as governments, corporations, and wealthy individuals.
In Mexico, 9 to 17% of the population is considered of white European descent (10 up to 19 million in 2010). This means such segment of the population controls from 42.8% up to 58.2% of the nation's wealth.
No one controlled all the wealth and resources. Wealth was concentrated in the hands of rich landowners and of entrepreneurs. Many of the former were patricians, who were the landed aristocracy. The latter were the equites (equestrians) who were bankers, moneylenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining. The engine of wealth were the thriving trading networks in the empire and beyond. Trade was carried out by private firms and individuals. The state run some landed estates and some of the mines.
Those that have the resources
A term that best describes a society where the landed aristocracy holds most wealth and power is a feudal society. In a feudal society, power and resources are concentrated in the hands of a small noble class that controls land and resources, often at the expense of the rest of the population.
Those that have the resources
minority group
A combination of the words: 'Wealth' and 'Wellness', meaning the wealth of wellness
minority group
minority group
oldest, elite families
Natural resources.