answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Supreme Court would not go against the concept of slaves being property as opposed to human beings and the court would not enforce the rights of a slave over the rights of his master. Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who did Dred Scott v Sandford demonstrated that the Supreme Court cannot go against without risking popular anger and opposition?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a definition for opposition?

Opposition is a movement against something.


Who was the slave that sued for his freedom in the supreme court?

Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court in the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857. The Supreme Court decision ruled against granting him his freedom and also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens.


What is a opposition?

Opposition just means being against something.


What does against mean?

It means you are in opposition to something or someone.


What is the action of Mr. Torres in the courage?

Mr. Torres showed courage by standing up for what he believed in, even when faced with opposition or challenges. He demonstrated bravery in speaking out against injustice and taking action to make a difference.


If you are anti something are you for or against it?

If you are anti something, you are against it. Being anti something means having opposition or opposition to that particular thing.


What is a definition of opposition?

The definition of opposition is resistance or dissent expressed by action or argument. For example, if you were to play a sport, the team you are against is your opposition.


Why did the supreme court ruled against dred Scott?

The Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott in 1857 in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford because the Court held that Scott, as a black person, was not a citizen and therefore could not file a lawsuit. The decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820, stating that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories.


What slave sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court?

Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. The court ruled against Scott, declaring that African Americans were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further inflamed tensions over slavery in the United States.


Slave who sued for his freedom?

Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom in the United States. The Supreme Court's decision in the case, known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, ultimately ruled against him in 1857, determining that slaves were property and not entitled to citizenship or freedom under the Constitution.


What was the reason for the opposition against the Muslims?

For killing you if are not muslim.


Why did the opposition against the Vietnam war grow?

The draft.