Liberalism
Karma, good or bad, doesn't exist. It's a concept of asian religions, like Hinduism, which believe in rebirth cycle. They believe that you should collect good karma by doing good deeds in life so you would rebirth into a better being after death and continuing this cycle eventually free from the rebirth and obtain nirvana, ultimate state of good feeling.The whole concept is wrong though, since it implies that there are inferior beings, inferior humans, and it keeps the caste system working in India. All beings are the same in value, no are higher than others, and rebirth is only a myth they like to believe in. So is nirvana and so is karma. You should do good in life of course, but you don't need the concept of karma for that. Since you cannot rebirth into a new life, you should even more make your only life worth it, do good to people around you, and they will do good to you. That feels sincerely more nice than the idea of imaginary nirvana.
In those areas where most people could not read, the reason was a lack of cultural emphasis on literacy. But we should not assume most people could not read throughout medieval Europe. The Byzantine Empire had a primary school system operating at the village level, founded in 425 AD, which continued until 1453 and taught both boys and girls. The Jews and Muslims also had schools where most boys, and some girls, were taught. We have tended to believe anything written by Renaissance writers about the ignorance of the age from which they were so proudly recovering, and much of what they wrote was not true. Please use the link to the related question below for more information.
There, no such thing as white people, gentile and all corcasions are not gentile,s .the north and south divided over issues like who should be running the predentcey . The had jefferson davis the north aberham lin
to navigate where people were supposed to do there work and they were also good and respected the gods so they will learn how to do as they wish and get what they want or what ever they want so that is what i am thinking is that they should not prevent the people from simply ignoring the church and doing as they want and they can do as they wish and will do what ever a lord tell a serfs what to do plus they can not go some where without a lords permissions. that is why i feel bad for people
Everything
Thomas Hobbes believed that citizens should have the right to self-preservation and the right to defend themselves in order to maintain peace and security in society. He also believed that citizens should have the right to transfer their individual rights to a sovereign ruler in order to establish social order and prevent a state of nature.
Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes believed in the necessity of a social contract where individuals agree to give up some freedoms in exchange for security and order. He argued that without a strong central authority, society would devolve into chaos and conflict. Hobbes also believed in the natural equality of all individuals and their innate self-interest.
The pilgrims, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke
John Locke believed that people could be trusted to govern. He believed that people had the right to life, liberty, and property. He said that people should have a word in who should be governing them !
Hobbes argued that because the "general will" of the people was for freedom, the people as a whole should force individual citizens to conform to the general will.
People who believe all mankind should have control of production, distribution and wealth.
Hobbes believed in the concept of a social contract where individuals give up some freedoms to a sovereign in exchange for protection and order. He thought a king with absolute power was necessary to maintain social order and prevent chaos and civil war, as he believed humans were naturally selfish and competitive. Hobbes thought that a strong central authority was needed to ensure stability and security in society.
Hobbes's and Locke's views were different because,Locke believed that people have three natural rights Life, Liberty, Property. Hobbes on the other hand believed that people should give up their rights to the government so they could live in a safe and orderly way.
Hobbes's and Locke's views were different because,Locke believed that people have three natural rights Life, Liberty, Property. Hobbes on the other hand believed that people should give up their rights to the government so they could live in a safe and orderly way.
Hobbes's and Locke's views were different because,Locke believed that people have three natural rights Life, Liberty, Property. Hobbes on the other hand believed that people should give up their rights to the government so they could live in a safe and orderly way.