You may be asking who argued Brown v. Board of Education,(1954) before the US Supreme Court. The lead counsel for the Petitioner (Brown, et al.) was Thurgood Marshall, who later became the first African-American to serve on the Court.
Attorney Charles Hamilton Houston, former Dean of Howard University Law School, hired Marshall to work with the NAACP. Thurgood Marshall later became a founder of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, an independent, but related, arm of the national organization responsible for much of the legal battle for African-Americans' civil rights.
The NAACP and the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund brought many cases to the US Supreme Court under the leadership of prominent African-American attorneys. Thurgood Marshall was, perhaps, the best remembered by history, but was by no means the only lawyer working for civil rights, nor was Brown the only case the NAACP sponsored.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.
Thurgood Marshall
You will have to find somebody that is an expert in the area that you need, it is advisable to hire them as a consultant first to see how they are and make sure they wont hurt your case.
The Supreme Court ruled that certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring &. certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring.
Active justices may hire four law clerks each; retired justices are entitled to one law clerk.
You will need to attend the court hearing. You may want to hire a lawyer for this case.
You will almost certainly lose the case by default. Can you hire a lawyer to appear in court for you?
Based on the fact that active justices typically hire four clerks for each Term, there were probably 36 working in the Court in 2002. Retired Justices are entitled to hire one clerk each, but there were no former justices still living in that year.
The Supreme Court ruled that certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring &. certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring.
At this point in your case, to file an appeal, you must hire an attorney and it must be filed in the court of the original case unless, the case was in a federal/Supreme court. If it was in Supreme court, you must have an attorney file a motion to move your case to the new court. If this judgment was from a collection agency, make sure you challenge the debt being owed in your appeal. This means that the debtor has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you owe the debt detailed in the judgment. They must provide physical evidence (the contract you signed, a detailed listing of everything you bought, all the signed receipts for everything you allegedly purchased) to obtain a valid judgment. Ask your attorney to tell you about debt validation and how to challenge a debt.
You can apply a job but when you have criminal background check that is pending the record still stays you still have to go to the court hearing and i if you appear to the court and clear the case and that is the time the record will gonna be removed
The supreme court interprets the constitution and its findings apply to all states aswell as excutive and legislative acts. For example lets say Florida passed a law stating that african americans can not vote. People will feel that their constitutional rights have been violated and hire a lawyer to sue the state. The case goes straight to the supreme court for a hearing and the Judges hear both sides and figure out if in fact florida did violate the constitution. After the judges comfirm that the fifteen ammendment does protect the right to vote and constitution states that no state should deny the right to vote on gorunds of race the case goes in favor of the person suing the state. After this has been settled All states must adhere to the supreme court finding. In a simple way pretty much the court interprets the constitution and enforces it like congress can make a law that people feel is against the constitution and the supreme court agrees and says Nope that law is against the constitution therefor the law is nulled. This all has to do with the checks and balances which each branch checks and balances itself.