Want this question answered?
The Cosmic Microwave Background, discovered (almost by accident) in 1964, perfectly matches what the Big Bang Theory predicted. No other hypothesis can begin to explain it, beyond saying "Well, it's just there and I have no explanation why."
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
It largely supports anatomical evidence and provides more detailed information for specific relationships
Intelligent design, Hovind Theory Added: The above are not scientific theories but more ideological assertions in nature. No positive evidence supports either assertion.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
OK, I'll ask. "What is the evidence?"
Alternating bands of magnetic polarity as you move away from the mid-Atlantic ridge.
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
Theories can be changed or rejected if and when the scientific evidence no longer supports the theory.
bull
rocks
rocks
The Cosmic Microwave Background, discovered (almost by accident) in 1964, perfectly matches what the Big Bang Theory predicted. No other hypothesis can begin to explain it, beyond saying "Well, it's just there and I have no explanation why."
Milk and your moms poo
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
the big bang theory
cosmic microwave background radiation