If you're talking about England then you could argue the Magna Carta of 1215 as it forced King Richard to place himself and members of his government under the rule of law. Also, look at the English Bill of Rights agreed to in the Glorious Revolution whereby William of Orange (King William III) and Mary II agreed to a Bill of Rights that laid out rights that all English citizens were entitled to and that the monarchy could not withhold.
the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
theee
wit swag
Because their power was absolute. They could over-rule Parliament and the church.
England was an absolute monarchy until the end of the English Civil War. The English Civil War lasted from 1641-1651.
Magna Carta
Actually, quite the opposite. Absolute monarchs exercise supreme power; similar to a despot, or dictator; and are bound by no laws of a constitution, or parliament.
a) it was opposed to the absolute power of monarchs, and the Emperor of Austria was an absolute monarch. b) The Emperor of Austria was Marie-Antoinette's brother
money (taxes) which buys power (army)
Absolute monarchs were not needed. It simply happened. When Charles I became an absolute monarch, he lost his head. When James II of England became an absolute monarch, he escaped England with his life. No one was willing to fight on his behalf. Kings simply try to gain more power for themselves just as presidents do.
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Where did the Monarchs get there Power