Thomas Hobbes John Locke
Many consider Thomas Hobbes to be the father of modern political philosophy due to his influential work "Leviathan," which addressed the social contract and the nature of government. Hobbes' ideas laid the foundation for many political theorists who followed him.
nursing theorists and his contributions
Marx and Engels got many of their ideas from other philosophers, economists and political activists.
Learning theorists focus on the individual's direct experience with the environment, while social learning theorists also emphasize the influence of observing and modeling others. Learning theorists often prioritize reinforcement and conditioning, while social learning theorists highlight the role of cognitive processes and social interactions in shaping behavior.
Theorists such as W.E.B. Du Bois, Frantz Fanon, and bell hooks are often associated with the struggle for a racially egalitarian society. They have written extensively on race, racism, and the importance of social, economic, and political equality for all individuals regardless of their race.
Aryeh Botwinick has written: 'Epic political theorists and the conceptualization of the state' -- subject(s): History, Political science, State, The, The State 'Skepticism and political participation' -- subject(s): Social participation, Equality, Political participation 'Postmodernism and democratic theory' -- subject(s): Skepticism, Philosophy, Political science, Postmodernism, Democracy 'Democracy and scarcity' -- subject(s): Political science, Political participation, Scarcity, History
Machiavelli took a primarily human behaviour based approach in attempting to guide rulers in the administration of government. He used descriptions and predictions of outcomes as justifications for types of political systems as opposed to the primarily normative foundations of many other political theorists and philosophers.
is the reality assumed by cognitive theorists relative or absolute
Marxist theorists.
Perhaps the two most referred to military authorities on 19th Century warfare, Henri Jomini and Carl von Clausewitz had slightly different views on political appointments to generalships that may apply to the US Civil War. Jomini studied the US Civil War and he opposed political appointments that both presidents Lincoln and Davis made. Some readers of both military theorists claim that Clausewitz would have understood it based on his argument that policy creates war, and the US Civil War was the result of political policies. There was, however, agreement between these theorists on this: That generals were made not born. There was nothing to prevent a politician, with the necessary attributes and study of warfare to become a capable general. US Civil War political appointees however, were not much inclined to study warfare before engaging the enemy.
The idea was propsed by several political theorists, including the Baron de Montesquieu (Charles-Louis de Secondat1689-1755).