The driver that slid on the ice of course, because although it was an accident, the driver at the stoplight was doing nothing wrong, while the one on ice slid into him/her.
If a driver runs a red light and causes a collision, the driver who ran the red light is typically at fault for the accident.
No. For example if a driver stops at green light and the driver to his rear hits him, it is the driver in front's fault.
It is driver B's fault because you now that driver A should stop because other cars are already driving so he should of stopped instead of you keep going
that would be the person that goes into reverse, because as long as you are stopped it is not your fault. the only possible chance of it being your fault is if you are in motion, but even than it would be a technicality that you could be at fault.
Most likely yes.
Depends. If you've stopped and they've crashed into you from behind, then no.
99 times in a hundred
The person who caused the collision is at fault. If someone ran a red light he/she gets the points on his/her license and his insurance gets to pay the damage. The unlicensed driver just gets the ticket to force him/her to get a license.
both a and b (i think...)
The vehicle at fault would normally use their insurance. If their insurance does not cover the damage or the police considered the accident a non fault, the car stopped at the light will have to pay for their own vehicle.
Both can be charged. Driver one: running a red light and colliding. Driver two: operating without a drivers license. (personal opinion: Driver one's insurance company is going to have to pay.)
You should have insurance whether it is your fault or not.