It was not just one ruler who loved gladiatoria fights. The Romans loved them.
It's better to be loved 'cuz people will like you.
He vow to dedicate his life to peace and follow the teachings of the Buddha
he was selfish and loved being ruler
He vow to dedicate his life to peace and follow the teachings of the Buddha
Not all he loved killing people like he captured them and then he hunted them.
Frankly speaking, no human being lives up to his obligations. If a ruler does not live up to his obligations and yet his rule is established and he is followed by the majority, no Muslim has the right to rebel (Khrooj) against him. The Muslim scholars, though, are divided in their opinion, yet most of them say that to avoid bloodshed of the Muslims, the ruler should be advised by the scholars to mend his ways. Yet, rebellion will be Un-Islamic if it results into bloodshed, disorder and disharmony in the Muslim society. A common Muslim should try to live up to his own obligations.
Machiavelli believed that a ruler must be both feared and loved, but if they cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. He also emphasized the importance of being cunning, adaptable, and willing to act ruthlessly when necessary to maintain power.
because he loved hes people enough to split them in half and build temple for people
If you're referring to the Pharaoh, Egyptians loved and respected the Pharaoh depending on the ruler himself and how he reigned.
According to Machiavelli, a ruler should be feared rather than loved by his subjects in order to maintain power. He should be cunning, decisive, and willing to engage in deceit and manipulation to achieve his goals. It is important for a ruler to prioritize the stability and success of the state above all else.
Akbar the Great was one who loved education and embraced arts and literature. He was the ruler of his empire at its peak. One side note: even though he loved learning and make people read to him, he couldn't actually read himself.
No, Machiavelli believed that a ruler should prioritize their own power and stability over the happiness of the people. He argued that it is better for a prince to be feared than loved, as fear ensures obedience and stability in a ruler's domain.