Want this question answered?
they were against ratifying the constitution
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
They would not have enough state votes to pass the constitution if slavery was outlawed by it. The south would have voted against it.
it did not guarantee basic rights
it did not guarantee basic rights
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.
many members of congress and the state government were against the new constitution, because it took power from the government and gave it to the people.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
because they were afraid that they would lose some of their power and they did not want it to end up like the situation were they were ruled over by one person
it did not guarantee basic rights