Floyd Olson. Olson had a different approach to the depression, he wanted the government to act to raise farm & labor income. He wanted a radical change.
The most realistic threat to Franklin D. Roosevelt's re-election chances in 1936 was Republican nominee Alf Landon. However, Landon's campaign faced numerous challenges and he failed to gain significant support or overcome Roosevelt's popularity. As a result, Roosevelt won a landslide victory, carrying all but two states in the electoral college.
Both recognize the threat of the enemy but emphasize America's power to defeat it.
No due to the fact they are realistic looking they can pose as a threat to law enforcement and can trigger a call to shoot the holder of the grenade.
yes it does in the old times it was not much of a threat but now it has become polluted and can cause serious floods in a 35 mile radius
It usually means that he likes you and considers the other guy a threat to his chances with you. but it depends on what the guy you like said
FDR had answered his critics and was more popular than ever. In the Election of 1936 he had only the moderate Republican Governor of Kansas, Alfred M. Landon, to face. He was no real threat to FDR who won reelection by a huge margin of votes, to another term as President.
If there is a tornado watch what you have to remember is that it does not mean there is an imminent threat of tornadoes. Even when you area is under a tornado watch, your chances of actually having a tornado are still quite small.
Military capability = the so-called "big stick". So we had to put together a powerful military to make the other countries somewhat more...pliable...to US demands. It's a credible, even if unspoken, threat.
Is a hidden threat that is foreseen to happen or a secrete threat.
A grave threat is a threat made very seriously.
The robber made a threat to harm the store clerk if she didn't give him the money from the register.
What do you mean is a veiled threat "legal?" A threat is a threat. Threats are technically illegal. Are you saying, by veiling a threat, can you avoid responsibility for making the threat? It depends on who heard it and how well veiled it was. If more than your victim can understand the threat being made, you are not protected.
The probability of a threat is 1. The threat exists. What is important is not the threat but the probability that the threatened event happens.