answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who wanted harsh penalties for the south?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What political party wanted harsh penalties for the South and full rights given to blacks including the right to vote?

They referred to themselves as "Radical Republicans" .


The philosophy that crime does not pay when an offender experiences harsh penalties is?

what is the philosophy that crime does not pay when an offender experiences harsh penalties


What are the penalties for causing an accident without car insurance?

If varies state to state, and some have very harsh penalties, including severe fines.


How to impose harsh penalties on the culprits?

put the culprits into jail for long time,it can be awareness for them.


How did radical republicans feel about the return of the south to the union?

Radical Republicans generally wanted a strict Reconstruction policy for the South, including the enforcement of civil rights for freed slaves and punishment for Confederate leaders. Many felt that the return of the South to the Union was premature and that more drastic measures were needed to ensure lasting change and justice.


Following the Civil War the political group which took the view of Reconstruction that harsh penalties needed to be doled out to former Confederates while giving full rights to Freedmen was called?

Democrats took the view of Reconstruction that harsh penalties needed to be doled out to former Confederates while giving full rights to Freedmen.


How is crime effected in an renaissance period?

Crime was affected in the the renaissance period due to the harsh penalties meted on those found guilty.


Are penalties a deterrent?

{| |- | Penalties, if severe enough, can serve as a deterrent. If the penalty is not harsh enough, often the case with some environmental issues, the offending party will simply pay the small penalty and not change their way of doing business. If it is too harsh, it may prevent companies and individuals from taking risks that could lead to beneficial actions. |}


Penalties are deterrent?

{| |- | Penalties, if severe enough, can serve as a deterrent. If the penalty is not harsh enough, often the case with some environmental issues, the offending party will simply pay the small penalty and not change their way of doing business. If it is too harsh, it may prevent companies and individuals from taking risks that could lead to beneficial actions. |}


When are penalties too harsh for the crime?

IF penalties are set, these, in a democratic country, are set by the people's elected representatives. Thus by definition the penalty fits the crime in the eyes of the majority. If you feel that the penalty is too harsh, that is simply your opinion not a fact. * In the past, higher penalties were designed to discourage violations of the laws, often by "making an example" of convicted offenders. But they had the effect of filling prisons for many years with minor offenders, and laws were changed to provide more appropriate sentencing.


What was slavery like in the north?

not as harsh as it was in the south. they did not have to work for life like saves in the south had to.


Was Removal harsh in South Africa during apartheid?

Yes he was