John Pitcairn
On April 19, 1775, the leader of the British force which was defeated at Concord and then retreated under fire back to Boston was Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith. Under orders to uncover and destroy arms rumored to be hidden in Concord, Lt. Col. Smith's forces were eventually outnumbered by the rapidly responding "minutemen", were defeated by this force in Concord itself, then backtracked quickly (and in poor order) to their base in Boston.
John Pitcairn
A+
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
Lawyer and planter. He defended the British soldiers tried for the Boston Massacre when they went on trial. John Adams was the lawyer and farmer - he was also the one who defended the British Soldiers. Sorry...Samuel Adams was mostly a political activist and a brewer.
There was not a winning and a losing side in the Boston Massacre. Five Colonials died, and the soldiers were tried in civil court. Two were found guilty of manslaughter. But it was not a win nor a defeat. It was just a moment in history.
They sent soldiers, and they thought that the colonist were on the verge of a riot.
The Boston Massacre had effects on both sides. The colonists though it was the British's fault while the British thought it was the colonists' fault. The trail did not help at all. The British soldiers that were tried got off with minimum punishment. Only two British soldiers were punished by being branded the letter M, for murderer, on their thumbs. This helped spark the American Revolution due to the reactions of the colonists. The results of the court fuled the anger that led to events after, like the Boston Tea Party.
On the evening of April 18, 1775, Paul Revere was summoned by Dr. Joseph Warren of Boston and given the task of riding to Lexington, Massachusetts, with the news that regular troops were about to march into the countryside northwest of Boston.
John Pitcairn
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
Lawyer and planter. He defended the British soldiers tried for the Boston Massacre when they went on trial. John Adams was the lawyer and farmer - he was also the one who defended the British Soldiers. Sorry...Samuel Adams was mostly a political activist and a brewer.
There was not a winning and a losing side in the Boston Massacre. Five Colonials died, and the soldiers were tried in civil court. Two were found guilty of manslaughter. But it was not a win nor a defeat. It was just a moment in history.
They sent soldiers, and they thought that the colonist were on the verge of a riot.
The Boston Massacre had effects on both sides. The colonists though it was the British's fault while the British thought it was the colonists' fault. The trail did not help at all. The British soldiers that were tried got off with minimum punishment. Only two British soldiers were punished by being branded the letter M, for murderer, on their thumbs. This helped spark the American Revolution due to the reactions of the colonists. The results of the court fuled the anger that led to events after, like the Boston Tea Party.
The English soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre were put on trial. Two of them were found guilty of manslaughter and were branded on the thumb as punishment, while the other six soldiers were acquitted.
New England militiamen-who later became part of the Continental Army-surrounded the town of Boston, Massachusetts, to prevent movement by the British Army garrisoned within. So the americans tried to fight them off.
Hostilities between the American colonists and the British army did not begin in 1776. The seeds of the rebellion of one Great Britain's wonderful and wealthy colonies, the American colonies had been brewing many years. The world of today would have been radically different if the British had not lost the American Revolutionary War. In 1770, tensions between Bostonians and the British troops were high. The soldiers were constantly harassed. A crowd of Boston folks were forming a crowd around a small group of British soldiers. Believing their lives were in danger, the soldiers fired into the crowd. Five Bostonians were killed near Customs House. This was labeled the Boston Massacre and the soldiers were placed on trial.
The name Boston Massacre not accurately describe what happened because it wasn't really a massacre. It is likely that the soldiers were cornered and threatened by a mob and fired in self defense. They were tried and acquitted.
wrong, he tried to face the british by himself but he killed his soldiers and he tried to stop but he dranded their blood and ate their souls