Want this question answered?
this was not in question form... im assuming you ment this to be a true or false, yes or no question. In that sense it is true. he did do study cells and their was mnay more he did but im old and not quite sure
what is a way
65 miliion years
1 is is discovered cells. 2 is he invented the first ever microscope. 3 he made useful observations.
time measurement
Galleleo
Yea... Robert Hooke examamined a cork cell under a microscope. He realized that it looked like tiny boxes which he later named "cells."
Anthony van Leeuwenhoek
this was not in question form... im assuming you ment this to be a true or false, yes or no question. In that sense it is true. he did do study cells and their was mnay more he did but im old and not quite sure
Write down why you see.
The sumerians
Record observations and ideas which are appropriate
A way to organize and record results and observations is using data table
No, absolutely not. You should be making observations as you go, and recording them. Then, when the experiment is over you can draw conclusions, but if you wait till after to record your observations, you won't remember them all.
You would obviously record your observations in the first part of the scientific method i.e titled commonly as "Observation". Because only after recording your observation you can move onto the second part of scientific method i.e "Questioning".
A record of observations of the world
what is a way