0
Who were the advocates of centralization and why did they want to alter or abolish the Articles of Confederation What was the major problem with the Articles and why was changing them so difficult?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and a few others were the advocates. They wanted to alter/abolish them because it created a government that was too weak and pissed off the people. the problem was mostly that the gov it created was too weak. it was difficult because a certain number of delegates had to agree on the changes and that was difficult to make happen. they also weren't supposed to abolish the articles. none of the delegates had permission from their state to destroy it; that was why they closed all the doors and windows to the building they were in while they were doing this.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who were the advocates of centralization and why did they want to alter or abolish the Articles of Confederation?
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Articles called for a weak central government with the confederation having their own governments.
Why was the interstate commerce difficult to conduct under the articles of confederation?
The central government had very little power with the articles of confederation and couldn't regulate trade conduct.
Under what document were the American colonies loosely bound during the revolutionary war?
"Articles of Confederation" OR "confederation" or "the Articles of Confederation"
Why was it difficult to pass laws under the articles of confederation?
you had to get 9 of the 13 colonies to approve it
Why was it so difficult to pass laws under the Articles of Confederation?
The Articles' weakness was that they gave the federal government so little power that it couldn't keep the country united. The Articles were abandoned for the Constitution.The Articles of confederation did not give the federal government the power to taxThe Articles of confederation did not have an executive branch in other words no presidentThe Articles of Confederation did not have a judicial branch to resolve disputes and set policy.It was very difficult to pass laws under the Articles of Confederation 9/13 of the states had to agree and almost impossible to revise the Articles the need every state to agree in order to make a change.
Who were the advocates of centralization and why did they want to alter or abolish the Articles of Confederation?
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Articles called for a weak central government with the confederation having their own governments.
Why was the interstate commerce difficult to conduct under the articles of confederation?
The central government had very little power with the articles of confederation and couldn't regulate trade conduct.
A likely reason that government under the articles of confederation was difficult was because?
they were gs
What document preceded the constitution as the framework for American government?
the articles of confederation
The U.S. Constitution replaced the Articles of what?
The Articles of Confederation.
Why did delegates gather in 1787 for the constitutional convention?
To amend the Articles of Confederation.
Under what document were the American colonies loosely bound during the revolutionary war?
"Articles of Confederation" OR "confederation" or "the Articles of Confederation"
Why was it difficult to pass laws under the articles of confederation?
you had to get 9 of the 13 colonies to approve it
Why did Americans want a stronger government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation?
Americans wanted a stronger government than the Articles of Confederation provided for a number of reasons. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation also did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. Furthermore the Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. Finally the Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation.These shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation led Americans to seek a stronger more effective government that could better meet the needs of the nation.
What was the name of the first document that governed the United States?
the articles of confederation was the first governing document
Why was it so difficult to pass laws under the Articles of Confederation?
The Articles' weakness was that they gave the federal government so little power that it couldn't keep the country united. The Articles were abandoned for the Constitution.The Articles of confederation did not give the federal government the power to taxThe Articles of confederation did not have an executive branch in other words no presidentThe Articles of Confederation did not have a judicial branch to resolve disputes and set policy.It was very difficult to pass laws under the Articles of Confederation 9/13 of the states had to agree and almost impossible to revise the Articles the need every state to agree in order to make a change.
What word describes the Articles of Confederation?
Weak describes the Articles of Confederation.
