The anaconda would definitely win since the andaconda has speed with its killer striking speed it would latch on to the Bear in a matter of seconds and have it constricted while the bear is still trying to claw it. The bear does have strength and size but an andaconda can take out a alligator with ease, a bear is just an easy meal. That is if it could fit it in its mouth. After all an Andaconda has nothing but muscle which puts strength back behind its grip which makes the andaconda the victor here.
The giant polar bear would win because it would use its razor sharp claws to dig in the walrus since it has a larger size advantage.
Polar bear in the north pole or anaconda if its fighting in the equatorial zone.
Polar bear.
polar bear
Polar bear, they are known as the most carnivorous bear.
It depends on the environment... If it is out in the open in a field, a tiger could probably gain better position and win. However, if an anaconda is in hiding, waiting to ambush, it could subdue a tiger.
A polar bear would totally lose because a rhino would charge at the polar bear and knock it with its horn.
The anaconda already got a 25 kill streak against others, so now the anaconda has a Tactical Nuke. The anaconda would win.
It depends on the health and size of the two animals, and the position of where are they attacking. If the ox struck the polar bear with its head or knocked its chest, the ox would win the fight. If the polar bear swiped and clawed the ox to death, the ox would be a meal of the polar bear.
Narwhals. They are narwhals!
the shear size and strength of the killer whale would own the polar bear
If a pack of wolves can kill a grizzly then it can kill a polar bear!!!
On land the bear. In the water the crocodile .