Who would win in a fight between Nicholson and Ledger?
Ledger hands down. Unless it was a full moon, then Nicholson. If it happened during a solar eclipse, then it would be a tie unless it was a Wednesday during the months of April, June, November and February -- in which case Nicholson has the edge. If however it is a leap year, then its Ledger all day everyday . No one would win on a Mother's Day, Valentines Day or Christmas.
1 person found this useful
The eagle is bigger, and the hawk is not actually faster. The eagle would win.
Assuming that they fought (the two have no common ecologicalhabitats), either could win. The bear is much heavier and stronger, and has sharp, deadly claws.However, the lion is more agile and a large lion could possiblykill a bear if it inflicted injury to the bear's neck. There areinstances of a w…olf pack killing a bear in this way. There are records of Siberian tigers, a cat somewhat larger thanlions, killing brown bears. ( Full Answer )
I'll try to answer this in the most educated way I can. Chuck Norris is an allround champion of several martial arts, while the ninja is most likely specialized in Chinese/Japanese martial arts. To tell you the truth it just depends. If the Ninja had a weapon, like the long bamboo rod from Kindo, th…e Ninja could win. I would most likely put my money on Chuck Norris, because of his outstanding performance in Martial Arts. ........................... what if chuck Norris is a ninja? --------------------------------- It depends on who the two people are that are fighting between Chuck and the Ninja. ------------------------------------------------------ Indiana Jones ( Full Answer )
A polar bear would totally lose because a rhino would charge at the polar bear and knock it with its horn.
As this is a question with no historical evidence, there are several acceptable answers to this question. Werewolf Victory A werewolf would win because of its super strength, agility, speed, and stamina. Look at the movies Underworld, Twilight, and Van Helsing. They all include a werewolf whoop…ing a vampire's ass. Vampire Victory The strength of a werewolf is entirely dependent on the lunar cycle. Within 2-3 days of the change to being a werewolf (both prior and post) and during the "wolf" period, the werewolf is significantly stronger than the vampire and this seems to to be corroborated by most vampire and werewolf sources. However, this period of strength lasts for around one week per month. During the remainder of the period, the werewolf is reduced to the strength and fortitude of a normal human, ages like a normal human, and can be wounded like a normal human. The vampire, by contrast is continuously in a state of physical prowess, provided he is well-fed, moving more quickly than a normal human, having better reflexes than a normal human, and being more sensitive (stronger sense of smell, sight, etc.) than a normal human. Therefore the contest between the vampire and werewolf, should by the power of odds, be resolved nearly 80% of the time in the vampire's favor and only 20% of the time in werewolf's favor. ( Full Answer )
THE ULTIMATE WILDCAT FIGHTING TOURNAMENT tiger - winner v.s loser - leopard lynx-winner v.s loser-cougar lion-winner v.s loser-mt.lion bobcat- loser v.s winner -cheetah tiger winner fights loser lynx lion winner fights loser cheetah CHAMPIONSHIP TIGER FIGHTS LION THE CHAMPION IS THE.................…........ TIGER An elephant could probably beat an earthworm. ( Full Answer )
Ghandi would priase Allah and go boom but sub zero would freeze him, then ghandi would priases Allah again
The hulk because he is She hulks cousin and the hulk is the strongest marvel hero ever!
i think it would be a pit bull because its bigger and stronger andhas stronger teeth. It also has lock jaw so once it has hold of itin its teeth it wouldn't let go.
Well, this fight most likely wouldn't happen, a polar bear against a leopard? Although it is most certainly an excellent and curious concept, I would say polar bear, though leopards are quick, in this case I think the sheer brute strength of the polar bear would win out.
Dobermann wins. Where I live there was a Dobermann who fighted against 2 alsation. The Dobermann killed both of them.
I have actually seen this go down in my chicken run many times. Thechicken wins every time. To top it off, all the other chickens willgang up on whatever the first one attacks. Squirrels are greedylittle critters, so they will keep trying to get into whatever thechickens have. They will come back an…d get their butts kicked dayafter day. ( Full Answer )
Solid Snake, Mario can't really fight he is after all a plumber. If solid snake didn't cheat with weapons then Mario would win
A panther is only a leopard, or puma, so would have no chance against the much larger tiger.
A human will not last long against the polar bear unless the human is armed with a gun.
Iron man. Proper answer from a different user Hulk because unless red hulk drains hulks power he doesnt have hulks same ability of being infinately strong as long as he keeps getting angrier where as red hulk kinda reachs a limit
Hippo. Hippos are actually the most deadly animal in Africa, and are so much so that even a pride of lions would think twice about tackling a hippo cow or bull. A hippo's jaws are extremely powerful, and will kill a bear instantly, like it has with humans that have had the unfortunate problem of com…ing too close to an angry hippo. Another answer: Although a hippo has thick skin to protect itself from a grizzly bear's razor claws and deadly teeth, the hippo also has a worse aggressive behavior of killing humans and flipping down boats. Hippos have been known to kill large nile river crocodiles for protecting their young and themselves. ( Full Answer )
kratos because of his weapons and magic and also a god but link has a god mask and an ocarina that can disrupt time
Zetsu, because he doesn't need sight to see(wich makes itachis BIGGEST weapon) he can make 100,000 clones that don't die in one hit and he can move underground. By the time itachi killed the clones his chakra wouldn't be enough, to handle black zetsus wood style.
My money is on the kitten. The Kitten would eat the smurf, so the kitten wins.
It would be an almost even fight but Optimus Prime would win because he is stronger and a prime.
Definitely the T-Rex. T-Rex is as tall as a building and can challenge against big dinosaurs or even King Kong.
That all depends on the bull itself. Not all bulls have horns, and not all bulls weigh 2000 lbs. It also depends on the breed of the bull and its temperament. Normally bulls, as prey animals, choose to flee from a predator like a polar bear rather than stand and fight, and a polar bear wouldn't know… what to make of a bull in the first place, since they don't actively hunt cattle, but instead seals and walruses, and maybe the occasional caribou and muskox. Maybe if the bull was a little Dexter the polar bear might win. But if it was against a 2200 lb Spanish Fighting Bull the polar bear may loose. The polar bear may even lose if it's against a hot-tempered Chianina bull. So who knows? ( Full Answer )
Sonic... Sonic is faster than the speed of sound and Bitey is only pretty fast compared to him. But If I had to take a guess on who the audience wants to win I'd probably say Bitey. Bitey has generally more beautiful artwork and funnier stories than Sonic and Sonic has a ten year losing streak of ba…d games, bad TV, etc.. It's probably SEGAs fault that the audience would want Bitey to win. They made Sonic look horrible. Bitey probably would have better chance of beating Sonic, if we knew more on what he is capable of. ( Full Answer )
The rhinosaurus would win. The rhino weighs two tons (4000 lbs) and the tiger weighs 600 lbs. If the tiger would be stupid enough to attack the rhino, he couldn't even manage to penetrate the rhino's thick hide. Although the rhino doesn't have the claws and deadly jaws that the tiger has, he can sma…sh the tiger against the dirt, or a tree, or throw him up into the air with his horn, backed up by two tons of thrust. This is like comparing an 18-wheeled semi-truck with 20 caliber machine guns blazing, against a train. The truck, with all it's weight and stinging bullets, is going to get blasted, run over, and crushed by the bigger, heavier, solid-steel train coming at it at full force. Bye, tiger. ( Full Answer )
The ninja would win. He has the advantage of weapons (swords,shurikens, poisons, ect). He also had an opposable thumb, and humaninginuity.
the bear would kill a wolverine easy because the wolverine is small but tough but one claw from the bear is doom for the wolverine the winner is the grizzly bear noah davis wrote this
Well, Winnie-the-Pooh has the initial advantage because he has back legs, whereas Sooty just has a hand up his backside. However, Winnie-the-Pooh is only stuffed with stuffing, whereas Sooty contains a large fist - significantly more powerful than teddy-bear stuffing and capable of punching red-shir…ted bears hard on the nose. Then again, Sooty doesn't have a mouth (or if he does, it's stitched up), whereas Winnie-the-Pooh does, and it is presumably filled with hugeawesome bear teeth that could rip Sooty (and the hand inside him) apart in seconds. But then, Sooty is a magician and has all the powers of the Dark Arts at his beck and call, so I'm inclined to think he'd use his evil powers to simply disintegrate Winnie-the-Pooh and have done with it. ( Full Answer )
i think that Ty would probbaly win this fight, as Hassan wouldn't stand a chance. Paul.
Actually it depends on what type it is if it was a bloodthrsty spino it would knockout the t rex but it is true that a spinosaurus is a better fighter and if u diaagree please answer differently
Okey. Lets size 'em up. Dilophosaurus and Ceratosaurus were both 23 feet long, but cerato out-wieghed its rival by 1,000 pounds. Dilophosaurus was faster and smater, but Ceratosaurus was stronger and had much larger teeth and jaws. So who would come ontop? In my opinion, Ceratosaurus.
A ninja would win because they are mostly light and agile, while aknight wearing over 50lbs of armor would be slow and open for quickattacks. Knights were very good fighters but became obsolete afterquicker and more skilled fighting styles were introduced tomid-evil warfare. ---- I disagree. A full…y equip knight in late period plate (ie about the same timeperiod as the early Samurai and Ninjas) is pretty fast moving aswell as armoured - shape of plate rather than weight being the key- and he has a shield, a longsword (which is a good weapon,designed for fighting on foot or horse and in a long melee), andprobably a mace of some sort for close in work. What removed knights from the top of the food chain wasn't lighter,better troops it was decent projectile weaponry which didn'trequire long training from childhood to use, ie Guns and Crossbows,and the training and drilling of cheaper more numerous troops,Pikemen especially. This leads to mass armies rather than householdtroops and the end of the single combat that knights were best at. They become Heavy Cavalry, drilled soldiers rather than individualheroes, that still have a place in warfare for another 700-800years. (The last charge of lance armed cavalry in the British armybeing successfully delivered during the opening stages ofthe First World War!). ( Full Answer )
I'm giving this one to Panthera, because its bigger and could crush bones with it's teeth
The Cat would win hands down. Cats have much sharper claws and teeth and they are much faster and more agile than most breeds of dogs including Yorkshire terrier. (contrary to popular opinion, cats can often defeat dogs considerably larger than themselves)
Tigers commonly kill sloth bears, and lions are nearly as powerful as the tiger, so the lion would overcome the sloth bear.
it would probably be the grizzly. My opinion: 1200 pounds of muscle with claws that is always in a bad mood against 800 pound monkey. Sounds like you end up with full bear and Gorilla Steak tartar
I would say a rhino would win because of the horn and jus its "amour plate"
I have taken time out to answer your question as i have been in your shoes before. After alot of research my conclusion was that the pigeon would win as it is more faster and agile it is also smaller so it can fit into small gaps and ambush the eagle. Hope you found this information useful :-) …Pigeon Veteran. To Pigeon Veteran, this is very helpful. Me and my girlfriend will have alot of fun talking about this. Thanks HarleyCostinPav. :) x ( Full Answer )
It depends on the environment... If it is out in the open in a field, a tiger could probably gain better position and win. However, if an anaconda is in hiding, waiting to ambush, it could subdue a tiger.
Most likely the crocodile. A crocodile would attack and try biting the enemy with its powerful, large jaws and sharp teeth, especially when the enemy is attacking it. An attacking tiger fight a crocodile would not have a good chance unless the crocodile is weak or tired from fighting. In the water, …the crocodile would totally win by grabbing the tiger with its jaws. A crocodile on the land can also win a fight with a tiger since it has tough skin and a long size for balancing itself. Since crocodiles are more aggressive and big, then the crocodile would win the fight against the tiger. ( Full Answer )
A tiger. Lions require a lot more energy than a tiger, spends more time sleeping, and is also a smaller feline. A tiger has bigger, longer claws and sharper teeth.
I guess it depends on what animal, but since it's two against one tiger, probably the two lions would win. But if it's just one lion against the tiger, the tiger will most likely win
If labs could beat German Shepherds then the military and police would be using them instead. Can you imagine a 60 lb yellow lab running down a vicious criminal on the run or intimidating Al Quaida prisoners? Give me a break. A German Shepherd would tear a lab to pieces. Their jaws are twice the siz…e with a far greater bite force and longer grip. Their bone structure is way heavier along with their general weight. Hmm, a lab is strong, but gs's are fast and sharp, it'd be pretty even I think It's illegal, I'm only answering this because someone has to answer it . ( Full Answer )
Albert wesker would win Becuse he would run all around him and when he is right he would us his 2 hand to go through him. Ganondorf is nothing.
omega shenron ssj is dominated by broly id say that ssj2 would beabout even so ssj3 would be able to beat him so ssj4 would probablydominate him and since omega shenron is stroger than ssj4definately omega shenron unless broly went ssj4 or something
Lions exist, demon do not. Lions win. . A demon is a spiritual being and a lion is only an animal, the demon would win.
KING KONG!! Just smash it off the cliff!! King Kong will win by smashing it off the cliff of the mountains, but wolly-mammoth can have a chance to win by ramming into king Kong.
The answer depends 100% on the man and on the dog. A small man can take on a small dog no problem, but with a big dog that has a vicious temperament, this is questionable. A big man against a big dog, without any sort of tools or weapons at the man's disposal, may also question the man's ability to …win against such a dog. A big man in top physical condition and excellent training in animal control can take on an untrained dog no problem, so long has he has the proper tools to defend himself with, which is necessary for ALL animal control officers. A 100 lb blind man will be a trained German Shepherd, rottweiler or doberman's lunch. Note that dog fighting or training dogs to kill humans is illegal in a lot of countries, however knowing how to defend ones-self against an attacking dog is very important for a person' survival. ( Full Answer )
Depends on what cattlebeast we are talking here, and whether it is horned or not. A bull tends to be more ferocious than a cow would, and double that when he's got horns. However, a cow can be just as dangerous if she has a calf that she needs to protect with her life. Two dogs, when they're working… together, are often great at taking down an animal larger than themselves. And it really doesn't matter what type or size they are! One distracts the bovine while the other comes in behind and tears out the hamstrings. Then when the bull or cow or whatever cannot stand any more and is too tired to fight anymore, then they go in for the kill. However, the one distracting the bovine would have to be really careful about getting in the way of those horns, otherwise it will end up one on one, and the bovine will win. ( Full Answer )
Deer have sharp hooves and can rear up and strike out with them. An inexperienced dog that does not know how to hunt or kill deer can easily get hurt by such actions from a deer, especially a doe that is protecting a nearby fawn. Bucks that are in rut are even more dangerous. Their antlers are li…ke daggers, and their attitude towards most living things, especially when cornered, can be very furious to the point of being fatal. Even a seasoned dog that has learned to kill deer for food will stay out of a rutting buck's way. So who will win in a fight between a dog and a deer? Well it depends on the circumstances of either animal, like that described previously. In most cases, if the dog is smart and able to learn fast and has the instinct to kill, the dog will win by dodging the flying hooves and antlers and going for the throat of that deer. Usually death comes after the deer tires to the point of exhaustion when it cannot run no longer. ( Full Answer )