0
Backing up your arguments with evidence adds credibility and provides support for your claims. It helps to show that your arguments are well-researched, logical, and based on factual information, increasing the persuasiveness of your point of view and making it easier for others to understand and accept your perspective.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Back up your arguments with evidence?
I can support my point with facts and data from reputable sources. By citing studies, research papers, expert opinions, or documented evidence, I can provide a strong foundation for my arguments and demonstrate the validity of my claims.
What are smaller arguments that in turn help support the thesis?
Smaller arguments are specific points or pieces of evidence that support the overall thesis statement. They provide more detailed explanations or examples that back up the main argument and help strengthen the overall message of the thesis.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
What are the characteristics essential to the process of critical thinking?
Critical thinking involves being open-minded, logical, and analytical. It requires the ability to question assumptions, examine evidence, and consider multiple perspectives before forming a conclusion. Effective critical thinkers are also able to communicate their thoughts clearly and back up their arguments with reasoning and evidence.
Why persuasive speakers need to use evidence?
Persuasive speakers need to use evidence to support their claims and arguments because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to their message. Evidence helps to validate the speaker's points and can convince the audience to accept their viewpoint. Without evidence, the speaker's arguments may be perceived as weak or lacking substance.
Back up your arguments with evidence?
I can support my point with facts and data from reputable sources. By citing studies, research papers, expert opinions, or documented evidence, I can provide a strong foundation for my arguments and demonstrate the validity of my claims.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Who had better results and conclusion out of lamarck and Darwin?
Darwin, of course. Lamarck did not have the evidence to back up his acquired characteristics and use and disuse concepts, but Darwin had massive amounts of evidence and well structured arguments for his theory of natural selection.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
How did the speaker address arguments and counterarguments?
A speaker addresses arguments and counterarguments by providing his or her own arguments. The speaker will have to provide evidence that supports his or her own arguments.
What do you do in a group debate?
In a group debate, listen actively to others, take turns speaking, present your arguments clearly and confidently, back up your points with evidence or examples, and be respectful of others' viewpoints even if you disagree.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
Why is it important to build grassroots for a party?
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
Why is it important to build grassroots to support for a party?
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
What evidence is used to refute the theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
