Dragons are normally there to guard something, maybe treasure, Damsels, a secret item or scroll ETC.
Knights are not actually that brave...normal knights in medieval Europe were rude, abrasive, and drunk most of the time. They pledged to the king and the church, to serve each.
Before a person could become a knight, they would be a squire then a page.
These stories (I presume) would come from medieval Europe, passed down from generations.
No. Dragons are mythological creatures in stories.
No. Dragons are mythological creatures in stories.
Dragons are not real, but plenty of fictional dragons kill people in stories.
No, komodo dragons do not own pets. Especially no dragons. Dragons are really hard pets and komodo dragons know. Yet they might be related to the ancient stories about dragons...
No. "Fantastic Beasts and where to find them" (related to the Harry Potter stories) lists 10 different types of dragons; other fantasy stories also differ among themselves about the properties of dragons.
Romania hasn't stocky dragons; don't believe in stories for children.
Since dragons are fictional they didn’t eat anything. They have never existed outside of stories.
The HobbitThe Ring of the Rhine GoldBeowulf
Knights in stories and legends fought dragons to prove their bravery and valor, protect their kingdom or people, and to claim treasure hoarded by the dragons. It was a common theme in medieval folklore and literature to depict knights as heroic figures who faced and defeated powerful mythical creatures like dragons.
The reason is that long ago their ancestors had stories about dragons that were passed down through the generations.
In the middle ages, dragons were mythical or legendary creatures and did not really exist. There may have been stories about dragon slaves, but there were never any real dragons.
No. The Romans regarded dragons as wild animals. And there were many stories of encounters with dragons where many men would get killed.