0
Why are hypothesis valuable even if it is not supported by data?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do scientists consider every hypothesis valuable A. A hypothesis requires no further investigation if it is proved by the experiment. B. A hypothesis can be used to explain a conclusion even if it?
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
Why can a hypothesis be valuable even if its wrong?
Yes
Why can a supported hypothesis not be called a theory?
A hypothesis cannot be call a theory because,it has not supported a prediction even in the face of several experiment.
What is the difference between a scientific theory and a hunch?
A hunch is unsubstantiated. Scientific theory is theory in which an idea or even a hunch has been thouroughly tested- thru a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, and results based on the scientific method. It is supported by other experiments and generally accepted by professionals in the field
If the data from an experiment does not support your hypothesis can you revise it or come up with a new one?
Yes. That's the whole point of experiments. If you reckon something will happen, but it doesn't then you have to change your hypothesis. Or your experimental method. Which is why scientists self regulate by publishing claims that other scientists then try to recreate or disprove. Or even just criticise your methods.If your data doesn't support your hypothesis, but you doggedly stick to it anyway, you've created religion.
Why do scientists consider every hypothesis valuable A. A hypothesis requires no further investigation if it is proved by the experiment. B. A hypothesis can be used to explain a conclusion even if it?
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
Why can a hypothesis be valuable even if its wrong?
Yes
Why can a supported hypothesis not be called a theory?
A hypothesis cannot be call a theory because,it has not supported a prediction even in the face of several experiment.
How is it possible for a hypothesis to be accurate if there's no data to support it?
It's not. Next Answer: It is possible for a properly formulated hypothesis to be accurate even if there is no data yet to support it. A hypothesis is a conjectures or best guess to describe a situation of phenomenon based on available information. Until enough proof is available, the hypothesis may be either incorrect or it may be correct or accurate Once sufficient data is accumulated testingt the hypothesis, the hypothesis is either rejected or accepted.
Can a hypothesis still be right even if the experiment says it is wrong?
Yes, although if the experiment is performed correctly there should be relatively little chance of this occurring. This is referred to as a type II error in statistics - the data supports rejecting the hypothesis even though the hypothesis is correct.
How is a hypothesis checked?
Im not an expert but a hypothesis I think is done by using the senses of the body and mind, and thinking really hard and working over and over again to find a hypothesis. And you keep making a hypothesis until it is your final answer.
Two reason why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
What is the difference between a scientific theory and a hunch?
A hunch is unsubstantiated. Scientific theory is theory in which an idea or even a hunch has been thouroughly tested- thru a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, and results based on the scientific method. It is supported by other experiments and generally accepted by professionals in the field
Do you already know the correct answer to a hypothesis before you being collecting data?
Typically, no. While a researcher might anticipate a particular result, the hypothesis is only that - what the expected result might be (and often, there may be several possible expected results or even none.)
If the data from an experiment does not support your hypothesis can you revise it or come up with a new one?
Yes. That's the whole point of experiments. If you reckon something will happen, but it doesn't then you have to change your hypothesis. Or your experimental method. Which is why scientists self regulate by publishing claims that other scientists then try to recreate or disprove. Or even just criticise your methods.If your data doesn't support your hypothesis, but you doggedly stick to it anyway, you've created religion.
What do scientist do when experiments show their hypothesis is incorrect?
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
Give at least two reasons why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?
i like 69 in the but
